Python Coding engagement report
@clcoding - 655K followers on X
Measured over 92 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 655K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 92 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.458% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 92 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 112x its own typical post.
Measured over 92 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Python Coding's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Python Coding sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 57% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 357 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 2026112x their median
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄| | Don't Push | | to Production | | on Friday | |___________| (\___/) || (⌾ㅅ⌾) || / づ
- Sep 12, 202664x their median
Anderson Cooper asks Anthropic CEO about AI wiping out humanity. https://t.co/EA9DPQzBG6
- Sep 11, 202636x their median
https://t.co/HfmkiTrcza
- Aug 28, 202618x their median
GIVEAWAY ALERT! I’m giving away 2 brand-new hard copies of the Python Automation Cookbook – Third Edition by Jaime Buelta, published by Packt. The book includes 100+ recipes covering scalable Python workflows, MCP integrations, and AI-powered automation. How to Enter: Like this post Share/Repost it Comment “PYTHON AUTOMATION” Two winners will be selected, and each winner will receive one hard copy of the book. Check Review of the Book: https://t.co/KRG7gBSCzo
- Sep 12, 202614x their median
Elon Musk, Dario Amodei, and Sam Altman have come together and agreed that AI development must be slowed down. They're calling for additional safety regulations so the tech they created doesn't cause an existential risk to humanity. https://t.co/KPPefm4qfw
- Apr 24, 202511x their median
Free Python course for Everyone - 2025 https://t.co/Z9H5vZ6hht https://t.co/aC8Eax0Jh0
- Aug 30, 20269.9x their median
Google Data Analytics Professional Certificate is a beginner-friendly program designed to help learners build job-ready data analytics skills. It requires no prior degree or experience and can typically be completed in 3–6 months. 📊 Google Data Analytics Professional Certificate What you’ll learn: Data cleaning & preparation Data analysis SQL Spreadsheets / Google Sheets Tableau & data visualization R programming Data storytelling Data ethics Case-study development AI-assisted analytics skills Level: Beginner Duration: ~3–6 months Format: 100% online, self-paced Certificate: Shareable professional certificate 👉 View the Google Data Analytics Professional Certificate https://t.co/BsCaKhGkF6 If you're building a Data Analytics / Data Science learning roadmap, this is a strong starting point before moving into Python, statistics, machine learning, and advanced analytics.
- Sep 10, 20268.3x their median
Free Web scraping with Python https://t.co/gDimemiRSc https://t.co/ufWZZDTbu8
- Aug 22, 20267.9x their median
Bayes' Rule with Python: A Tutorial Introduction to Bayesian Analysis (Free PDF) Get it Free: https://t.co/tktsWq5fij https://t.co/6HJ60omCfw
- Sep 12, 20267.8x their median
Introduction to Git and GitHub https://t.co/6mljBfYz45 https://t.co/JCYrtq3gPJ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 655K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 92 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.458% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 92 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 112x its own typical post.
- What is Python Coding's engagement rate on X?
- Python Coding (@clcoding) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 92 original posts from the last 30 days against 655,258 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Python Coding sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @clcoding have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @clcoding post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.