Citrini engagement report
@citrini - 288K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Citrini's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.176%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.5% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 36% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 20, 2026152x their median
In case something does happen to me, there’s only one thing the world needs to know. The United States has teleportation technology. It seems impossible but it’s true.
- Aug 1, 202619x their median
A notepad in front of U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent reads "To Do Buy Japanese Yen $5-10 bil" as he participates in a cabinet meeting at Camp David. The note, photographed at 11:33 EDT, came after Reuters earlier reported the Treasury had put banks on alert for a possible U.S. intervention in the market for Japan's currency. 📸REUTERS/Daniel Heuer
- Jul 31, 202613x their median
Leopold Aschenbrenner’s wedding included a “colloquium to discuss ideas in panels and breakout sessions.” I’m sorry, what? https://t.co/V1llVgJkHt
- Jan 27, 20265.1x their median
“haha I’m up so much YTD I could just close the book and be done for the year” you won’t though. we all know you won’t. nobody ever does. stop pretending and get your ass back to the pnl mines.
- Aug 26, 20264.3x their median
26 minutes apart btw https://t.co/H1SEsrYe8A
- Jul 30, 20264.2x their median
JUST IN: FT confirms Leopold Aschenbrenner is in trouble after a historic tech drawdown. FT reports SALP has been in talks with existing investors and lenders to raise fresh capital after heavy losses in the AI rout. It also floated letting some investors buy assets straight out of the portfolio. His stated catalyst for the recovery is an Anthropic IPO. I don't know why a bunch of you were saying that "he hedged" with a small sleeve of puts you saw on the recent 13F. One of us.
- Jul 2, 20264.2x their median
I remember in Q3 2023 we had like a 3 month long drawdown in every important AI name, all the people who thought AI was BS felt vindicated while the ones of us who believed continued buying. I think that same thing would kill half of you right now.
- Aug 25, 20263.7x their median
“Claude, criticize the Secretary of the Treasury. Make no mistakes.”
- Jul 17, 20263.6x their median
All we needed for the Korean market to bottom was to close the Korean market for a day
- Aug 8, 20262.6x their median
If we’re being real the late stage memory bulls in Q2 were some of the most annoying people on this entire platform.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.
- What is Citrini's engagement rate on X?
- Citrini (@citrini) has an engagement rate of 0.176%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 288,357 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.176%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @citrini have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @citrini post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.