Back to @citrini's profile

Citrini engagement report

@citrini - 288K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.176%
of 288K followers
Per impression
0.383%
132K views on a typical post
Reach
45.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
507
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
52 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Citrini's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.176%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 2026152x their median

    In case something does happen to me, there’s only one thing the world needs to know. The United States has teleportation technology. It seems impossible but it’s true.

    66K6.8K3.3K1.2K5.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202619x their median

    A notepad in front of U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent reads "To Do Buy Japanese Yen $5-10 bil" as he participates in a cabinet meeting at Camp David. The note, photographed at 11:33 EDT, came after Reuters earlier reported the Treasury had put banks on alert for a possible U.S. intervention in the market for Japan's currency. 📸REUTERS/Daniel Heuer

    7.2K2.2K1672061.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202613x their median

    Leopold Aschenbrenner’s wedding included a “colloquium to discuss ideas in panels and breakout sessions.” I’m sorry, what? https://t.co/V1llVgJkHt

    6.1K2542162291.3M viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 20265.1x their median

    “haha I’m up so much YTD I could just close the book and be done for the year” you won’t though. we all know you won’t. nobody ever does. stop pretending and get your ass back to the pnl mines.

    2.4K1006319487K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.3x their median

    26 minutes apart btw https://t.co/H1SEsrYe8A

    2.0K887522158K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20264.2x their median

    JUST IN: FT confirms Leopold Aschenbrenner is in trouble after a historic tech drawdown. FT reports SALP has been in talks with existing investors and lenders to raise fresh capital after heavy losses in the AI rout. It also floated letting some investors buy assets straight out of the portfolio. His stated catalyst for the recovery is an Anthropic IPO. I don't know why a bunch of you were saying that "he hedged" with a small sleeve of puts you saw on the recent 13F. One of us.

    1.8K1101001071.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20264.2x their median

    I remember in Q3 2023 we had like a 3 month long drawdown in every important AI name, all the people who thought AI was BS felt vindicated while the ones of us who believed continued buying. I think that same thing would kill half of you right now.

    1.9K967424529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.7x their median

    “Claude, criticize the Secretary of the Treasury. Make no mistakes.”

    1.7K85335132K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20263.6x their median

    All we needed for the Korean market to bottom was to close the Korean market for a day

    1.7K50406131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.6x their median

    If we’re being real the late stage memory bulls in Q2 were some of the most annoying people on this entire platform.

    1.2K339314229K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.

What is Citrini's engagement rate on X?
Citrini (@citrini) has an engagement rate of 0.176%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 288,357 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.176%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @citrini have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @citrini post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going