Back to @citrini's profile

Citrini engagement report

@citrini - 299K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.237%
of 299K followers
Per impression
0.787%
90K views on a typical post
Reach
30.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
705
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
88 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 705 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 90K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #oott, #tankers.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #oott, #tankers.

Compared with accounts its own size

Citrini's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.237%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 170 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 202688x their median

    In case something does happen to me, there’s only one thing the world needs to know. The United States has teleportation technology. It seems impossible but it’s true.

    66K6.8K3.3K1.2K5.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202614x their median

    A notepad in front of U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent reads "To Do Buy Japanese Yen $5-10 bil" as he participates in a cabinet meeting at Camp David. The note, photographed at 11:33 EDT, came after Reuters earlier reported the Treasury had put banks on alert for a possible U.S. intervention in the market for Japan's currency. 📸REUTERS/Daniel Heuer

    7.2K2.2K1652071.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20269.6x their median

    Leopold Aschenbrenner’s wedding included a “colloquium to discuss ideas in panels and breakout sessions.” I’m sorry, what? https://t.co/V1llVgJkHt

    6.1K2522122291.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.9x their median

    Oh it’s over over

    3.8K16219382704K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20265.2x their median

    What is AI really capable of in bio? To separate hype from reality, we spent 3 months working firsthand with @AnthropicAI's internal research model to see if it could create an experimental scorpion antivenom. Introducing Citrini Therapeutics. https://t.co/VAUBSi7sNy

    3.1K2131491751.2M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 20264.0x their median

    This selloff in rates is closer to the beginning than the end imo.

    2.5K11113545608K viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 20265.1x their median

    “haha I’m up so much YTD I could just close the book and be done for the year” you won’t though. we all know you won’t. nobody ever does. stop pretending and get your ass back to the pnl mines.

    2.4K1006319487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.1x their median

    Doing less training would be pretty incredible for the margins of the labs, no?

    2.0K7412927208K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    26 minutes apart btw https://t.co/H1SEsrYe8A

    2.0K887522160K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.0x their median

    JUST IN: FT confirms Leopold Aschenbrenner is in trouble after a historic tech drawdown. FT reports SALP has been in talks with existing investors and lenders to raise fresh capital after heavy losses in the AI rout. It also floated letting some investors buy assets straight out of the portfolio. His stated catalyst for the recovery is an Anthropic IPO. I don't know why a bunch of you were saying that "he hedged" with a small sleeve of puts you saw on the recent 13F. One of us.

    1.8K1091001071.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#oott#tankers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 705 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 90K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #oott, #tankers.

What is Citrini's engagement rate on X?
Citrini (@citrini) has an engagement rate of 0.237%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,770 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.237%, Citrini sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @citrini have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @citrini post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going