Back to @circle's profile

Circle engagement report

@circle - 301K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.087%
of 301K followers
Per impression
1.60%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
5.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
262
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 262 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 61% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Circle's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.087%, Circle sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link61% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 61% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 276 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202613x their median

    Q2 results are out. → Arc Mainnet launches September 16. → Founding validators joining Circle include BlackRock, DTCC, Galaxy, Global Payments, ICE, Mastercard, MoneyGram, SBI Group, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Corporation, and Visa. → We received our federal trust bank charter from the OCC to establish Circle National Trust, one of the first stablecoin issuers to hold a federal bank charter. → USDC captured nearly 70% of stablecoin transaction volume in June, according to Visa Onchain Analytics. Full results: https://t.co/v1jSV7zRFs

    2.2K495409383484K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202612x their median

    💙 https://t.co/qu3Uc4uqn4

    2.8K238602845K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.4x their median

    Circle 🤝 @OKX Circle and OKX are working together to expand USDC liquidity and trading utility across OKX. The collaboration supports broader access to USDC-denominated markets across spot, margin, and futures trading. As digital asset markets scale, trusted dollar stablecoin liquidity becomes core trading infrastructure. More ways for eligible users to trade with USDC.

    9201297233158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.5x their median

    The entire financial system is soon going to run on machine-driven, open-source systems. https://t.co/tB4J2Vx7V1

    700130542062K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.2x their median

    Arc Mainnet goes live September 16. Join the launch livestream for a live look at Arc, Circle Agent Stack, and the onchain infrastructure designed to support programmable money, agentic workflows, and global financial applications. Register today: https://t.co/s2JzypWrTw https://t.co/V6sSx1OXMA

    617122772755K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.4x their median

    CCTP V2 on @SuiNetwork is now live. Sending USDC on Sui just got easier. Using Circle’s trusted burn and mint infrastructure, developers can build with new capabilities for faster and more programmable crosschain experiences. • Inbound Fast Transfer • Programmable messaging • Hooks • More tooling for complex crosschain experiences Start building: https://t.co/wYTtcBCrF0

    4809443918K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.4x their median

    Stablecoins are now part of the actual dollar financial system, with 70 percent of real-world stablecoin transactions happening with USDC. https://t.co/0Sxk8wx1PR

    47975571543K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.4x their median

    Agentic payments are live on Arc. Our Facilitator Service gives x402 builders a hosted way to accept Circle-issued USDC on Arc, Base, and Polygon without running their own relayer or funding separate gas wallets. You build the service. Agents pay for it. https://t.co/vKU6AShrj6

    424741021945K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.1x their median

    Circle 🤝 @VolanteTech Banks are looking at where stablecoins fit inside the payment systems they already run. Circle and Volante are working together to help financial institutions evaluate USDC payment and settlement workflows within existing infrastructure. https://t.co/dsOZrEz4kD

    4186153920K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.0x their median

    Build a startup GTM agent with Circle Agent Stack. This tutorial walks through how an agent can: → Research a lead → Pay for enrichment with USDC → Write an outreach brief → Send the final output → Return a receipt log https://t.co/0yoOBcBUEg

    42250431227K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 262 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 61% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Circle's engagement rate on X?
Circle (@circle) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 301,227 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.087%, Circle sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @circle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @circle post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going