Back to @circle's profile

Circle engagement report

@circle - 294K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.097%
of 294K followers
Per impression
1.18%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
8.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
284
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canttameus, #cfc, #chebha.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #canttameus, #cfc, #chebha.

Compared with accounts its own size

Circle's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, Circle sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 301 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202612x their median

    Q2 results are out. → Arc Mainnet launches September 16. → Founding validators joining Circle include BlackRock, DTCC, Galaxy, Global Payments, ICE, Mastercard, MoneyGram, SBI Group, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Corporation, and Visa. → We received our federal trust bank charter from the OCC to establish Circle National Trust, one of the first stablecoin issuers to hold a federal bank charter. → USDC captured nearly 70% of stablecoin transaction volume in June, according to Visa Onchain Analytics. Full results: https://t.co/v1jSV7zRFs

    2.2K483397383468K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202611x their median

    💙 https://t.co/qu3Uc4uqn4

    2.8K238602845K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.1x their median

    Circle 🤝 @OKX Circle and OKX are working together to expand USDC liquidity and trading utility across OKX. The collaboration supports broader access to USDC-denominated markets across spot, margin, and futures trading. As digital asset markets scale, trusted dollar stablecoin liquidity becomes core trading infrastructure. More ways for eligible users to trade with USDC.

    9181327033153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.1x their median

    The entire financial system is soon going to run on machine-driven, open-source systems. https://t.co/tB4J2Vx7V1

    681127491647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.1x their median

    Stablecoins are now part of the actual dollar financial system, with 70 percent of real-world stablecoin transactions happening with USDC. https://t.co/0Sxk8wx1PR

    46774521340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.8x their median

    Build a startup GTM agent with Circle Agent Stack. This tutorial walks through how an agent can: → Research a lead → Pay for enrichment with USDC → Write an outreach brief → Send the final output → Return a receipt log https://t.co/0yoOBcBUEg

    42150421226K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    The agentic economy is about the transformation of agents from shoppers into cognitive workers. Jeremy Allaire on the infrastructure it will need to get there. https://t.co/C88V9DKaVu

    3246727433K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    USDC, EURC, CCTP, and Bridge Kit are now live on @Plasma! PSPs, fintechs, neobanks, and developers on Plasma can now access the world’s largest regulated dollar and euro stablecoins for a range of use cases: → Payments: Use USDC and EURC for remittances and global payment flows → Global FX: Power multi-currency FX operations → DeFi activity: Support onchain trading, lending, and liquidity provision → Treasury and B2B settlement: Power onchain treasury management, corporate payments, and global settlement using regulated digital dollars and euros Users can also deposit, send, and spend USDC with Plasma One, Plasma’s stablecoin app and card. With this integration, USDC and EURC are supported natively on 37 and 8 blockchains, respectively. CCTP is now available on 28 blockchains and enables smooth USDC crosschain transfers without third-party bridges. Get started today: https://t.co/fx7IuXIZVq

    28942311523K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    cirBTC is live on Ethereum as a 1:1 BTC-backed token, with native Arc support coming at mainnet launch. Designed for tokenized BTC transparency, cirBTC combines: → Segregated BTC custody → Disclosed reserve addresses → Chainlink Proof of Reserve → Onchain reserve data for verification A clearer reserve foundation for BTC-backed collateral across supported programmable markets. https://t.co/iG7CzsXaZg

    2943736826K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    CCTP extends Circle’s crosschain trust layer to more assets. Native EURC transfers with burn-and-mint are now available, starting with @Ethereum and @Base. One integration, more capabilities for what developers move. https://t.co/1p3wtRMzVo https://t.co/HGK64dZvSq

    23640301325K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#canttameus#cfc#chebha#spottedatthebridge

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canttameus, #cfc, #chebha.

What is Circle's engagement rate on X?
Circle (@circle) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 294,392 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, Circle sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @circle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @circle post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going