Back to @ciguleva's profile

Tatiana Tsiguleva engagement report

@ciguleva - 242K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 242K followers
Per impression
1.15%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
4.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
112
interactions (median)
Saved
0.124%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tatiana Tsiguleva's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Tatiana Tsiguleva sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,313 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,878 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202633x their median

    welcome to the singularity anon https://t.co/UanSagwaxs

    3.2K4344163231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202632x their median

    design review process https://t.co/AEECLsnvDh

    3.1K4395960105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202618x their median

    some songs are timeless... 🔊 https://t.co/Hy3nDtzrF5

    1.8K1454825117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202617x their median

    Midjourney Watercolours https://t.co/aAxduqk1xG

    1.7K11618553K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202617x their median

    https://t.co/VW3cRALeex

    1.8K934041K viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 202514x their median

    My 2024 with Midjourney! https://t.co/gA73peuDWN

    1.5K60519200K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202610x their median

    If I had to use one word to describe Midjourney v8.2, it would be SCALE. https://t.co/XHR03jCacg

    1.1K6027148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.0x their median

    We’re gonna start testing our Midjourney V8.2 edit model today! This model supports editing with instructions, generating images with other images, brush-based inpainting, and outpainting and also works with your MJ personalization, moodboards, and srefs. Have fun! https://t.co/ZtmHVPyCXv

    747437428115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.9x their median

    One clip. Infinite camera angles 🔥 Check out Lovart: https://t.co/ItCxMTycKx Lovart lets you run Seedance 2.5 on your original footage and pull any angle you want out of a single take, close-up, wide, low, overhead, without reshooting a thing. Coverage that used to need a full crew and a second setup day now comes from one clip. Huge for filmmakers, editors, and advertisers who need cinematic options in the edit. Our mission is to create 100,000 new jobs for creatives, looking to learn and stay ahead in AI? Join GenHQ: https://t.co/g0a6tIwmSX #LovartAI #Seedance #AIFilmmaking #CameraAngles #CreativeAI

    76781132467K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.0x their median

    Opus 5.5. 1,000+ of my Midjourney images. The last time I tried something like this in AE, my project exploded and I gave up. Music: Suno https://t.co/14RnamhvZ0

    7231836649K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is Tatiana Tsiguleva's engagement rate on X?
Tatiana Tsiguleva (@ciguleva) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,783 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Tatiana Tsiguleva sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ciguleva have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ciguleva post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going