Back to @cicciolina_uff's profile

Ilona Staller engagement report

@cicciolina_uff - 77K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.21%
of 77K followers
Per impression
1.99%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
160
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ilona Staller's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.21%, Ilona Staller sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 202612x their median

    Ero in una fiera ero la madrina della serata ma non saprei chi ha scattata questa foto .Cercasi il fotografo .hahahaha https://t.co/pAdE7XjdGN

    1.8K56461118K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20263.2x their median

    Foto di una bellissima serata cocktail party a Milano e foto ricordo con la bellissima @NaomiCampbell https://t.co/ZsBp8XOz7O

    4692020118K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20262.1x their median

    Non cicrederete ma era la mia conferenza stampa in Sudamerica che io adoro .Baci a tutti voi @cicciolina_uff https://t.co/5zPuGFFemk

    316166013K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2026

    Avevo un bell contratto con la casadiscografica americana RCA .ho incisodiverse ellepi .45 giri !ormai sono diventate dei cult !!! Potete avere dal mio sito ufficiale https://t.co/Z639PsGyTf e https://t.co/p2K2JVNdkJ email [email protected] 💋 https://t.co/16qRNg2uLT

    214117012K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    Buona domenica sera amici di X @cicciolina_uff https://t.co/dplXJVsXpe

    2128703.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Goodmorning friends baci Cicciolina_official https://t.co/FtMVdBYX4U

    2037909.7K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 2026

    Buonasera e buona cena amici baci @cicciolina_uff https://t.co/hAJ5OxYwI9

    1957408.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Buona serata a tutti .baci @cicciolina_uff https://t.co/A2wBKqyEqG

    1925509.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    Buongiorno e buon Ferragosto amici @Cicciolina_official https://t.co/BjWIdI8zjR

    18786012K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    https://t.co/DRFenKAkmx

    178510011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Ilona Staller's engagement rate on X?
Ilona Staller (@cicciolina_uff) has an engagement rate of 0.21%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,588 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.21%, Ilona Staller sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cicciolina_uff have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cicciolina_uff post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going