PlayerSells
Back to @christianllamar's profile

Christian Lamar engagement report

@christianllamar - 100K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.18%
of 100K followers
Per impression
1.16%
102K views on a typical post
Reach
102.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 1.18%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 102.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Christian Lamar's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.18%, Christian Lamar sits above the 75th percentile of the 11,915 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.345% to 2.48%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.051%
p750.345%
p902.48%
p99309.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 11,915 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 343,408 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.051%
75th percentile0.345%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile309.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link6% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 504 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 25, 202434x their median

    I was just expelled as the only Black Republican from AZGOP executive committee by RINOs in AZGOP LD2 for: supporting President Trump, signing up 285 new Trump Precinct Committeemen & holding the Republican AZ state legislature accountable for allowing 2020/2022 stolen elections. https://t.co/AIqi7NNu4D

    24K12K3.1K1.3K10M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202612x their median

    My boomer neighbor bought his house in 1991 for $92,000. He never refinanced. He simply paid it off. Today, his property taxes are about $2,100 a year because he’s owned it for decades. The exact same house next door just sold for $965,000. The 31 year old who bought it now pays roughly $10,800 a year in property taxes and nearly $5,000 a month on the mortgage. Same street. Same house. Completely different reality. We didn’t just price an entire generation out of homeownership. We priced them out of the future.

    11K1.7K1.3K114540K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202610x their median

    Are you happy about this MAGA? Now H-1B guest workers will not have time to find another H-1B job on American soil, or adjust their status and get another visa. They will have to self-deport immediately. How many Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS super-geniuses can we afford to lose? And think about how Costco will no longer be as crowded. Is this what you voted for?

    10K3891.2K154686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202610x their median

    JUST IN: Only 14% of men in US are over 6 feet tall

    9.8K5325921.1K4.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.2x their median

    "Why do prices keep going up?" I'd be happy to explain why prices keep going up...Inflationary monetary policy. "Why do we have inflationary monetary policy?" Well, there are a lot of reasons, but the primary one is that politicians really like to spend money, because it's an easy way to buy votes. The problem is politicians don't make money, so they have to get it through one of 3 primary ways... 1. They can tax...which is how they get most of it, but there is a point where taxation has diminishing returns because taxing someone too much leads to a lack of productivity or avoidance strategies. 2. They can borrow...which is one of their favorites because it allows them to kick the can down the road when it comes to actually paying for things; the problem is that at some point the government's credit isn't very good, and people don't want to voluntarily loan them money anymore. 3. They can print it...which is what we have been doing for a long time now. It's especially damaging because when the government prints a bunch of money to spend, it doesn't immediately cause all the prices to go up, so when the government spends the money, they are getting close to the full value of the dollar at the time that it is spent...it is only after the new paper dollars have started to circulate without a corresponding increase in supply that more dollars are competing over the same amount of goods and services and thus the prices go up, because the value of each dollar has gone down through money printing ie. "inflationary monetary policy." Eventually the inflation gets so bad that they have to stop printing and spending, but that only decreases inflation; it doesn't end it, so prices don't go down to where they were; they simply stop increasing at the previous rate. "Well, why don't they fix it?" Because it would cause the economy to significantly, albeit temporarily, tank, and then whatever party was not in charge would blame the party that was in charge, and the citizens suffering the most from inflationary monetary policy would punish the party that stopped the inflationary monetary policy. "So what's the answer?" Well...the American people could start getting a lot more educated and concerned about the dangers of fiat currency combined with an ever-expanding welfare state and economic central planning, or the system can keep going until it reaches a critical mass, collapses, and we go through a lot more pain than would have otherwise been required...

    6.6K1.5K31996130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20266.2x their median

    Now the self-confidence of young Chinese people has risen, and the past notion of worshipping foreign things and fawning over foreigners has also gone and will not return.👏 https://t.co/JM7mICgJtJ

    6.1K42165793320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.1x their median

    The American government is one big conspiracy against the American people.

    6.5K5567612231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Grocery store prices have to come down. But what do people expect the government to do about it? Do we want price controls? That’s a Hallmark of socialism. Consumers have to be willing to stand up for themselves against corporate greed. Not look to government for answers.

    6961714112930K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    JUST IN: Egg freezing among U.S. women has nearly quadrupled in recent years despite ~$7,000 upfront costs plus annual storage fees — Reuters

    967969249174K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    We owe illegal aliens NOTHING. We owe "naturalized" foreigners NOTHING. They have stolen trillions of dollars of our past, and present. You had your chance. You showed us you hate us. You hate our Country. You just want to steal from us and send it home to your shithole country. You are NOT welcomed here. You have to leave NOW.

    85123950105.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 1.18%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 102.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

What is Christian Lamar's engagement rate on X?
Christian Lamar (@christianllamar) has an engagement rate of 1.18%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,659 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.18%, Christian Lamar sits above the 75th percentile of the 11,915 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @christianllamar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @christianllamar post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going