Back to @chrispavlovski's profile

Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ engagement report

@chrispavlovski - 389K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.056%
of 389K followers
Per impression
1.30%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
218
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 218 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 262x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.056%, Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Nov 17, 2024262x their median

    Free speech saved. https://t.co/J0UykOfDgC

    52K3.7K1.4K3392.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202619x their median

    BREAKING: U.S. launches a $5 billion AI research initiative to uncover the causes of chronic disease & accelerate drug discovery.

    3.5K31415882633K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.3x their median

    It appears that Apple just removed Telegram from the App Store.

    3933363875K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.2x their median

    Happy Independence Day πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡²

    4302425116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.1x their median

    BREAKING: $RUM Group Inc. Reports Record Second Quarter 2026 Results - Record Revenue of $40.4 Million up 61% YoY - Q3 2026 Revenue Outlook of $87 Million to $93 Million

    38949255127K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20262.0x their median

    We are learning very quickly that people do not like techology making decisions, especially in sports. The value of human decisions and human based content (live sports, IRL, podcasts), is the future. AI and tech can only do so much, but it cannot and will not replace humans.

    3352571624K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.9x their median

    I've never been shy about $RUM Group's ambitions -- our Quake AI division is a real player and we will fiercely compete with the likes of Coreweave, Nebius and all neoclouds.

    3494923334K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.8x their median

    While everyone talks about models, at Quake, AI we will focus on the rails. The world will need new infra for what’s coming. Infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure.

    3174718045K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.7x their median

    I've never been so proud of our team at $RUM Group. We take punches and always get up. We continue to surprise the world with what we're capable of. We're more than video & a neocloud. Quake AI, with the combination of Rumble will lead us into the Robotic and Agentic AI era.

    2914627420K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026

    First SpaceX, and now META is building a cloud business (AI compute). I saw this coming in 2021/2022. I remember when some early investors were asking why $RUM was building a cloud β€” now everyone get its. $RUM’s Quake AI is built for this moment.

    2372741320K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 218 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 262x its own typical post.

What is Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ's engagement rate on X?
Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ (@chrispavlovski) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,690 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.056%, Chris Pavlovski πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chrispavlovski have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @chrispavlovski post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going