Back to @chrishughes_22's profile

Chris Hughes engagement report

@chrishughes_22 - 443K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.034%
of 443K followers
Per impression
0.48%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
7.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
152
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 443K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #safc.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Chris Hughes sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Feb 3, 202616x their median

    Has Gary Neville watched a completely different game to the rest of the world? All game acting like that was a masterplan and Chelsea be delighted with 10 minutes to go… Arsenal bang average for their standards and were completely allowed to be. 🤷🏼 anyone think otherwise?

    2.2K877710215K viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 202513x their median

    Devastating news. We're deeply saddened to learn of the passing of jockey Tommie Jakes, aged 19. Our thoughts are with his family and friends at this time. https://t.co/eoD3ISVllg

    1.5K207155161585K viewsView on X
  • Jan 7, 202613x their median

    After a VAR review, Michael Keane is sent off for pulling Tolu Arokodare's hair 🟥 https://t.co/o8Sz9UDiE3

    1.4K702212252.5M viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 20268.5x their median

    Alderete in top 5 CB’s in the prem! Consistently outstandingly good! #SAFC

    1.2K3432282K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 20266.9x their median

    THE FUCKING LADS MAN!!!! 🔴⚪️🔴⚪️🔴⚪️🔴

    1.0K229033K viewsView on X
  • Jan 10, 20266.7x their median

    Hawaaaaaaaay! Luke Onien different level today, faultless. One of his best 90’s in red and white #SAFC 🔴⚪️ https://t.co/wY4X7hCv6e

    97623173124K viewsView on X
  • Nov 29, 20255.8x their median

    WE ARE SUNDERLAND 🔴⚪️

    8451613032K viewsView on X
  • Dec 15, 20255.4x their median

    GOOD MORNING #SAFC 🔴⚪️ https://t.co/64vhXeo0v8

    80895122K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 20265.3x their median

    HAWAY THE FUCKING WIZARDS MAN, superb performance! Not that I give two shits, but a spineless performance from the Geordies, again. Not one of them has put a shirt on today and wanted to win, horrendous! GETT up! 🔴⚪️

    786159050K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20254.8x their median

    You’re a disgusting human being @scottieandrew, welcomed in with open arms but a horrible bully. Lazy and disgusting journalism, nothing but a hate spreader @scottieandrew! @CNN do better with these scumbags.

    58684633123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#safc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 443K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chris Hughes's engagement rate on X?
Chris Hughes (@chrishughes_22) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 443,205 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Chris Hughes sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chrishughes_22 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @chrishughes_22 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going