Back to @chokehzard's profile

Hzardous engagement report

@chokehzard - 428K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.786%
of 428K followers
Per impression
2.23%
151K views on a typical post
Reach
35.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.691%
1.0K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.786%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 151K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hzardous's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.786%, Hzardous sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 31 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 25, 20265.3x their median

    Rough and depraved https://t.co/sJAdzL8c80

    16K1.7K754978K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20263.9x their median

    https://t.co/ITjEwceJgc

    12K1.1K035845K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.8x their median

    https://t.co/1iuQcZMYaL

    12K1.1K039392K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20263.6x their median

    Can we stay in bed all day? https://t.co/5DK0cTdYfY

    11K959818809K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20263.5x their median

    Eat her after https://t.co/MS4sZkR4lI

    11K1.1K016771K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20263.3x their median

    Need not a want https://t.co/QcUQRO3uLD

    10.0K1.0K316893K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.8x their median

    https://t.co/en47iiKmyg

    8.8K793013527K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.8x their median

    No thoughts, just breed https://t.co/Z5mzaTgKwL

    8.2K1.1K074378K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20262.7x their median

    Princess treatment https://t.co/ti7jZJGe2y

    8.3K745017923K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.6x their median

    https://t.co/VsVR5GGRcP

    8.2K669011338K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.786%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 151K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.

What is Hzardous's engagement rate on X?
Hzardous (@chokehzard) has an engagement rate of 0.786%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 427,691 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.786%, Hzardous sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chokehzard have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @chokehzard post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going