Back to @chico_pinheiro's profile

Chico Pinheiro engagement report

@chico_pinheiro - 661K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.483%
of 661K followers
Per impression
8.71%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
5.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.483%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 8.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 125K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #timepatrus.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chico Pinheiro's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.483%, Chico Pinheiro sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link32% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 193 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 202640x their median

    MEU DEUS!!! RENAN SANTOS SOLTOU A MAIOR FOFOCA DESTA ELEIÇÃO: Flávio Bolsonaro teve, supostamente, um caso com uma candidata trans, candidata do PL, que está recebendo dinheiro do fundo partidário. TO SEM PALAVRAS!!!! https://t.co/WCEzSFL9PE

    113K9.5K1.8K7754.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202632x their median

    QUE RIDÍCULO! Ex-presidenta Dilma Rousseff é recebida com vaias ao chegar para votar em Belo Horizonte neste domingo. https://t.co/TzCD7QgkFc

    83K2.6K5.5K8.4K6.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20269.1x their median

    Cheguei, gente, no último dia antes da eleição. Careca, inchada, cansada, intoxicada de quimio, mas firme aqui na luta, esperando o Lula pro ato de São Paulo. A gente vai conseguir, tenho certeza. A gente vai reeleger o presidente Lula. Eu acredito. DOMINGO É 13 https://t.co/kDcceYtGCc

    25K2.4K1.3K94158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.7x their median

    Amigos mineiros, me expliquem como um povo tão generoso e inteligente elegeu por 2x um imbecil como o Zema?

    13K8551.1K252341K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.8x their median

    🗳️ ELEIÇÕES | Ana Castela receberá R$ 850 mil via emenda do PL após fazer o 22 Leia mais na coluna de Demétrio Vecchioli https://t.co/NdsG6LwfdU

    9.6K1.5K541428651K viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 20203.2x their median

    São Conrado, Rio, há pouco: “Chove sangue sobre as nuvens de Deus. E há poetas míopes que pensam que é o arrebol.” (Jorge de Lima, O grande desastre aéreo de ontem) https://t.co/AbKA0ntH9x

    8.1K4111.4K59View on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.5x their median

    EDITORIAL | Flávio é um candidato sob suspeita – “O eleitor tem o direito de ir às urnas sabendo exatamente de tudo o que pesa contra quem pretende governá-lo. A decisão de voto diz respeito apenas à sua consciência”. Leia o texto completo em https://t.co/qZJC1leTfe https://t.co/jqduzu4SkN

    4.1K1.1K2.5K221223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.1x their median

    Você quer essa gente na Presidência da República? https://t.co/hRCC6gcvys

    4.5K1.6K5974928K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.9x their median

    Judeus reagem a anúncio de Lottenberg como ministro de Flávio Bolsonaro e divulgam manifesto pró-Lula https://t.co/aLuvFmPanA

    4.7K61552493273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.6x their median

    ELEIÇÕES EM SÃO PAULO Haddad: Mesmo sob pressão, deu aula de honestidade ao rejeitar encontro com Vorcaro. Tarcísio: Recebeu R$ 2 milhões do Vorcaro na campanha. O próprio Vorcaro afirma que foi propina. https://t.co/9SZgF9k9zn

    4.0K884402024K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#timepatrus

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.483%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 8.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 125K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Chico Pinheiro's engagement rate on X?
Chico Pinheiro (@chico_pinheiro) has an engagement rate of 0.483%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 660,629 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.483%, Chico Pinheiro sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chico_pinheiro have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @chico_pinheiro post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going