Back to @cheolsoo0919's profile

안철수 engagement report

@cheolsoo0919 - 448K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 448K followers
Per impression
3.98%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
97
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 3.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.544% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

안철수's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, 안철수 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link48% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 48% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 202613x their median

    국민 주담대는 막아놓고, 사채로 이자 장사하는 이재명 대통령 https://t.co/71YPcgAP4L

    85539535515K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.8x their median

    [단독] 대북 지원 막혔는데... 올 예산 6676억 원 편성한 정부 https://t.co/w70W7aQi6B

    3352011688.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.3x their median

    이 대통령은 천만 서울시민께 사과하십시오. https://t.co/biacihcp0E

    2431323628.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.8x their median

    서울 강남 3구 6070에게 “집 팔고 수도권 떠나라”는 고려장 세법 개정안, 파기가 답입니다. https://t.co/qawm9yoi8N

    239992875.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.5x their median

    대미통상 최고책임자 심야경질, 국민은 알 권리가 있습니다. https://t.co/5KT2ckOrpC

    2141071456.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.4x their median

    알았으면 공범, 몰랐다면 무능... 李대통령은 밝혀야 합니다. https://t.co/qY45VPzOP9

    197923554.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.4x their median

    주택대출 반토막 낸 KB국민은행, 차라리 'JM재명은행‘으로 간판을 바꾸십시오. - KB국민은행이 주택담보대출 한도를 6억 원에서 3억 원으로 반토막 냈습니다. https://t.co/rUOB6fq9dp

    1861201754.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.3x their median

    ‘레버리지 노답 삼형제’ 김용범 한 명 사퇴로 끝낼 일이 아닙니다. 남은 두 형제, 이억원 금융위원장과 이찬진 금감원장도 물러나야 합니다. https://t.co/mXu5R8XSIG

    1941081243.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.1x their median

    '혐오 장사꾼' 용혜인의 장관 기용, 이재명 대통령의 정권 자폭 카드입니다. https://t.co/N17XwUGoCq

    191841743.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.9x their median

    이재명 대통령의 중수청장 후보자 재검증 지시는 명백한 직권남용입니다. 추천위 심사와 장관 제청을 거친 후보자를, 무슨 근거로 대통령이 뒷조사하라 합니까? https://t.co/7JeNOUjD0O

    162941954.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 3.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.544% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is 안철수's engagement rate on X?
안철수 (@cheolsoo0919) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 447,849 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, 안철수 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cheolsoo0919 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cheolsoo0919 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going