Back to @chenqiushi404's profile

陈秋实 Chen Qiushi engagement report

@chenqiushi404 - 507K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.037%
of 507K followers
Per impression
0.903%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
4.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
188
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 507K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.903% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, 陈秋实 Chen Qiushi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 16, 20269.3x their median

    北京一个有500万人民币存款的中国人,他感受到中国便捷廉价的快递、外卖、家政保洁、推拿按摩……他觉得这些真的是非常舒适。 可他如果拿着这些钱去到县城,或者缅甸、柬埔寨、委内瑞拉、伊朗等经济更落后、更低人权的地方,就可以享受到更加舒适便捷,甚至很奢华的生活。 那么这是否可以论证出,缅甸、伊朗等国家其实更加伟大呢?

    1.3K7240126618K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20269.2x their median

    赛车拼的是速度,但人性的勇气才是真正的高光。上海CGT赛事里79号车手洛克.哈托格,看见赛车起火直接放弃比赛,冲进火海救人。 输赢只是一场比赛,救人这一刻,他就是全场最帅的冠军。真正的赛车精神,从来不止争第一。 相比之下,赛事方所聘请的安全员,连救火的胆量都没有,放下灭火器就逃跑了,显然只是廉价甚至免费的志愿者。

    1.2K131352736K viewsView on X
  • Jan 21, 20267.6x their median

    总结中国历史:“打江山 坐金銮 睡女人 抢财产 防造反” 这五个基本动作,就是历代帝王将相的统治本质,以及权力运作的核心逻辑。

    1.2K11098782K viewsView on X
  • Jan 14, 20266.9x their median

    中国网友评论: 祝愿因小米汽车质量问题产生的所有危害,都转移到雷军本人身上!

    1.2K341025142K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.5x their median

    问:中国有那么多反智主义,反民主、反科学、反人权、反自由的混账言论,是否说明九年义务教育很失败? 答:大量反自由,反民主,反西方的人存在,恰恰说明了中国九年义务教育的成功。 https://t.co/3xgbydCgzA

    65369114492K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.5x their median

    日本街头一个老人摔倒了,围上来五个人救助,不一会儿救护车到了,一个生命很可能保住了 https://t.co/aM5bTYlKJB

    65021164252K viewsView on X
  • Jan 19, 20263.6x their median

    【华人被针对了?新西兰爆发抗议,抵制“掠夺式赶海”】 奥克兰上百居民近日集会,抗议愈演愈烈的过度赶海行为。有居民痛心指出,赶海者使用凿子、钢丝等工具“清空”岩池生态,导致昔日丰富的潮池生物几近消失。 抗议活动现场立有中英韩毛利四语标语,呼吁“只看不拿”。争议焦点指向小红书平台,大量“海鲜自由”攻略帖及收费高达700纽币的“赶海体验团”被指助推过度捕捞,甚至涉及非法代采。 然而,现场观察显示赶海者族裔多样,不少华人也积极参与环保,翻译标语、清理海底垃圾。渔业部长称正考虑临时禁令,当地华人社区发声呼吁尊重生态规则,避免族群对立,共同保护海洋环境。

    53553811392K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 20263.6x their median

    山东人小张,是个房地产中介,某天心血来潮在直播间买了一件行政夹克穿,端个保温杯进进出出。同事说,你就好像一个清朝农民,用纸给自己糊了个七品顶戴。

    6398201219K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 20263.5x their median

    人的这一生,不会只爱一个人,不曾只爱一座城市,不会只爱一家餐厅,不会只爱一本好书……却为何只能爱一个国家呢。

    48827129958K viewsView on X
  • Jan 17, 20263.4x their median

    喝茅台酒很了不起么? 那东西不就是高粱进行酿造,然后使用蒸馏工艺制造出来的一级致癌物么

    491131313107K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 507K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.903% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 陈秋实 Chen Qiushi's engagement rate on X?
陈秋实 Chen Qiushi (@chenqiushi404) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 506,675 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, 陈秋实 Chen Qiushi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chenqiushi404 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @chenqiushi404 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going