Back to @charlieINTEL's profile

CharlieIntel engagement report

@charlieINTEL - 6.6M followers on X

Measured over 221 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.058%
of 6.6M followers
Per impression
1.31%
293K views on a typical post
Reach
4.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.07%
204 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.67/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 6.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 221 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 293K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 221 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

Measured over 221 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

Compared with accounts its own size

CharlieIntel's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.058%, CharlieIntel sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202617x their median

    GTA 6 story is over 80 hours long if you just play the main storyline without exploring the world, Rockstar says https://t.co/oOoGR2TAYG

    60K2.8K5631.2K8.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202611x their median

    Rockstar Games says they began working on Grand Theft Auto VI in 2013, right after GTAV launched [Source: @Dazed interview] https://t.co/cxvcUCfCuH

    40K1.3K4302862.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202610x their median

    Grand Theft Auto 6 has over 600,000 animations for how NPCs can react in the world, compared to only 55,000 animations that were in in GTAV [Source: New York Times] https://t.co/5OPQM87VEX

    38K1.8K1382231.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.3x their median

    Grand Theft Auto 6 won't have microtransactions in the single player story or generative AI https://t.co/6EzUR7p1si

    27K872274148955K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.3x their median

    A look at the cinematic for calling in a tactical nuke in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 https://t.co/CDOBY9fnE6

    18K84577389711M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.1x their median

    Jason and Lucia want to be in a romantic relationship when Grand Theft Auto VI story starts, but whether it happens or not, is up to the player https://t.co/U67yiQvUcR

    18K5111373773.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.8x their median

    Grand Theft Auto 6 wanted system: - 6 star system, not 5 like GTAV - Can run off in alleyways and side streets - Jason & Lucia can split off to distract police - Cops can figure out what you're wearing and driving, so you can change clothes & cars - 'Criminal Profile' system https://t.co/weiC3g23CM

    18K7423825631K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.8x their median

    Skill based matchmaking has to go. Just makes the games so miserable. Activision has to stop exclusively reading their data and start understanding the way players feel.

    17K852658961.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.8x their median

    The Grand Theft Auto 6 leaks going around appear to all be real, as Rockstar has started to issue takedown notices to people posting the videos or the map.

    18K462140271.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.6x their median

    Switching characters in Grand Theft Auto VI is 'seamless' https://t.co/0e11MKj7Mj

    16K35237237313M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mw4#modernwarfare4

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 6.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 221 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 293K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 221 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

What is CharlieIntel's engagement rate on X?
CharlieIntel (@charlieINTEL) has an engagement rate of 0.058%, based on the median interactions across 221 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,581,868 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.058%, CharlieIntel sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @charlieINTEL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @charlieINTEL post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going