Back to @chandlerriggs's profile

chandler riggs engagement report

@chandlerriggs - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.02%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
7.57%
178K views on a typical post
Reach
13.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.499%
887 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Posts are seen about 178K times each, and 7.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 298K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.02%, chandler riggs sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.694% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 423 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 201622x their median

    i wish LOL https://t.co/zXopClqpfs

    207K83K2.1K5.0KView on X
  • Nov 17, 2022

    i’m being replaced wtf

    130K8.1K280346View on X
  • Oct 30, 20248.1x their median

    https://t.co/5KLb4LuLzB

    102K5.8K25979114M viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 2022

    i am in the final episode of TWD

    32K2.1K1.3K1.8KView on X
  • Jan 30, 20232.4x their median

    god i’m so happy that the last of us is good

    30K2.2K2802711.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20262.3x their median

    and here we go. my short film BIOHAZARD hits youtube this wednesday, 10/14. can’t wait for y’all to see it. check out my exclusive interview with @IGN from the link in my bio for all the info. any resident evil 7 fans here? https://t.co/ESt20l3cMq

    26K3.6K387386515K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20261.7x their median

    𝐁𝐈𝐎𝐇𝐀𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐃 | 𝐀 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞-𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝟕 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐅𝐚𝐧 𝐅𝐢𝐥𝐦 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐍𝐎𝐖 - https://t.co/DPRJYpVo3v Ethan Winters, while searching for his missing wife, finds himself trapped by the Baker family - a deadly, unstoppable force driven to violence under the influence of a mysterious infection…

    18K4.0K367772604K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 2024

    felt cute might delete later https://t.co/qD9nVeaZxu

    17K930416169563K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    after we did that opening dinner scene shot, we watched playback, all huddling around the monitor. when my producer walked up at this part and asked why we were watching footage from the game (not realizing it was our footage), we all knew we had something good on our hands

    16K1.2K26363178K viewsView on X
  • Nov 20, 2024

    arcane is hands-down the best show i’ve ever seen. live action or animated.

    15K1.3K160218351K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Posts are seen about 178K times each, and 7.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 298K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is chandler riggs's engagement rate on X?
chandler riggs (@chandlerriggs) has an engagement rate of 1.02%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,322,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.02%, chandler riggs sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chandlerriggs have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @chandlerriggs post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going