Back to @chambleebrandel's profile

Brandel Chamblee engagement report

@chambleebrandel - 5.3M followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.019%
of 5.3M followers
Per impression
0.455%
222K views on a typical post
Reach
4.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
49 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Saturday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 5.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 222K times each, and 0.455% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 66K interactions, about 122x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Brandel Chamblee sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link67% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 484 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 2026122x their median

    Nunca se olviden que Messi rechazó la oferta más alta de la historia del fútbol proveniente de Medio Oriente para, en cambio, irse a vivir a Estados Unidos. Resignó 500 millones de dólares anuales para que sus hijos fueron criados bajo los valores morales de Occidente. https://t.co/tZbVeZT9Yy

    60K5.4K1.1K1361.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202610x their median

    For 14 years, Dan Simpson spent his evenings delivering pizzas around Boise, Idaho after finishing his regular job. It was a routine he never expected anyone to notice. On March 28, 2026, one delivery turned into something unforgettable. The customer had ordered a Diet Coke, but the Domino's store had run out. Rather than arrive empty handed, Dan stopped at a nearby convenience store, bought the drink with his own money, and delivered it without charging a single extra cent. When the customer offered to pay him back and leave a bigger tip, Dan smiled and declined. "That's already a good tip," he said. The customer later learned Dan was only weeks away from retirement after 14 years of delivering pizzas as his second job. The Ring doorbell video was shared online, and people across the country were moved by the quiet kindness of a man who never expected anything in return. There was another detail Dan didn't know that night. The customer and his wife are visually impaired, and his decision to stop for that Diet Coke spared them a difficult trip to the store. What Dan thought was just a quick stop meant far more to the family than he ever imagined. Thousands of strangers came together to thank him the only way they could. A GoFundMe raised 171,635 USD, giving him a retirement he never expected. All because one delivery driver believed that doing the right thing was simply part of the job.

    9.6K8007025275K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20265.2x their median

    My son was promoted to Captain today in the Army… proud of him and of our armed services. https://t.co/mzQW5gxjUX

    4.9K702277225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.4x their median

    My random opinion nobody asked for on the POY race. What makes it so interesting to me from talking to different guys about it is how everybody’s definition of what makes a “player of the year” is different. That being said, nobody is right or wrong in that. It’s what is important to that specific person. Personally, I always view the difference of a good and great season is how many tournaments or majors a person has won. I think the best way to really debate it is which season would the players themselves actually rather have. Would they rather have more top 5’s, better scoring avg, consistency, wins, etc. Who has played better? Scottie has “played better” than anybody on the planet this season. No doubt. But… I find it hard to believe he would rather have his season (right now, pre Tour Champ) than Wyndhams which includes a major and one more W. A lot of this award also includes recency bias vs the entire season. The timing is important to be fresh in people’s minds vs remembering what may have happened early in the season. At the end of the day…. It’s not like an argument on other items where it’s a clear cut “this or that” kind of answer with stats to back it up. It’s all dependent on what an individual claims most important to make them the POY. All that being said- what happens at the Tour champ will be a deciding factor on who I vote for personally. Thanks for reading my rant that nobody asked for, everybody carry on with their day 🤣

    4.1K6923723695K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.1x their median

    Rory was asked about LIV players returning to the PGA Tour and the value they could bring. His answer..... https://t.co/EjZvmbqYFb

    3.6K1212951302.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.1x their median

    A surprise of a lifetime 🥹 Notah Begay III is this year’s recipient of the Payne Stewart Award presented by @SouthernCompany, honoring his character, sportsmanship and commitment to charitable giving. https://t.co/I5FTPwfzqa

    3.8K1759958452K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20261.8x their median

    Another Open Championship. Another year of lost luggage. This year it wasn’t British Error Ways, it was KLM (Keep Luggage Missing) but on a brighter note, there are pubs and pints. Go England. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/X2EiGOo31o

    1.7K311314231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.6x their median

    Checking in on LIV. https://t.co/mBxU8mKs1A

    1.5K24576934K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20261.5x their median

    Seeing others speculate on the topic, I had to throw my hat into the ring. I couldn't help myself. Free to read this one.. https://t.co/8bdrf7fU7x

    1.2K8117838407K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026

    Bryson used to admire Bobby Jones, the man who drew millions to the game with his integrity. These days, he’s become something else, a circus act, and it’s showing us there are downsides to “Growing the Game.” https://t.co/RPylxLkWF5

    9087926126174K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 5.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 222K times each, and 0.455% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 66K interactions, about 122x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Brandel Chamblee's engagement rate on X?
Brandel Chamblee (@chambleebrandel) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,254,287 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Brandel Chamblee sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chambleebrandel have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @chambleebrandel post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going