Ceyda Karan engagement report
@ceydak - 369K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 302 interactions against 369K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eksen, #sondaki̇ka.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #eksen, #sondaki̇ka.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ceyda Karan's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.082%, Ceyda Karan sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 68% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 43% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 427 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 29, 202659x their median
Russian strikes have destroyed 90% of Ukraine's modern storage facilities for various types of goods, according to Ukraine's Agricultural Minister Taras Vysotsky. Russia did not hit these targets on such a scale before NATO / Ukraine started their deep strikes against warehouses in Russia. Similarly, Russia did not have a blockade on Ukrainian ports before NATO / Ukraine started attacking Russian ships. Now, Russia is hitting everything. Why escalate by targeting civilian infrastructure in Russia when Russia has many times more air power and Ukraine does not have air defence? There is no reflection over these decisions, and there is therefore no course correction. The political-media establishment in NATO always pivot from excitement during reckless escalation, to shedding crocodile tears when the retaliation comes. Announce an end to NATO expansionism and put an end to this disastrous war. https://t.co/kSGUG8ZMuD
- Sep 1, 202630x their median
This July, while flying back from a NATO summit in Turkey, President Trump slipped off Air Force One in a catering truck and secretly boarded a different aircraft — leaving traveling reporters to fly on, unaware the president was no longer with them. Instadocs: The Decoy Plane, premiering September 4, unpacks the incident through firsthand accounts from members of the press corps who were aboard Air Force One as well as a former Secret Service agent and a former Air Force One crew member.
- Aug 27, 202629x their median
lol!!! https://t.co/SZfMXNtiWt
- Sep 1, 202612x their median
Heute will Bundeskanzler Merz Vergeltung an der Atommacht Russland üben. Wie bei Nord Stream steht schon fest: Der Russe war’s. Passenderweise hat er sich den 1. September ausgesucht – den Tag, an dem Deutschland 1939 Vergeltung übte für einen Überfall auf den Sender Gleiwitz, den es selbst inszeniert hatte. Geschichtsvergessen und größenwahnsinnig. Merz ist eine Gefahr für uns alle. #MerzMussWeg
- Sep 1, 20266.0x their median
🇷🇺Lavrov, as sociable as ever! In between two bilateral meetings, Russia’s foreign minister took a quick smoke break and some time to mingle with journalists https://t.co/XEtdXoFG5O https://t.co/oXs4Hs1alP
- Aug 29, 20263.7x their median
Not surprised. The BBC and the entirety of Western corporate media are garbage.🗑 "British state broadcaster the BBC this week ran a major story drumming up the alleged Russia threat and supposed looming retaliatory attacks on UK drone factories supplying Ukraine. The chilly warning purportedly came from a top Russian official – except that the individual in question has not been one in over three decades. At first glance, the piece titled “UK drone factories may face attacks from ‘unknown sources,’ says Kremlin adviser” looked legit, based on comments made on BBC Newsnight by Andrey Fedorov. The broadcaster presented the interviewee as a heavyweight Russian official, describing him as a “Kremlin adviser” and “Russia’s former deputy foreign minister.” The latter is partially true: Fedorov was the deputy minister in the RSFSR, the Russian republic of the USSR, between October 1990 and October 1991 prior to the formal dissolution of the Soviet Union. The other claim, however, is completely false. Fedorov used to be an adviser to Russia’s vice president until late 1993, the same year the vice president position was abolished, and has not held any public office since. Over the past decade, he has been best known as a political commentator and a media personality, frequenting assorted Russian political talk shows. BBC tries to hide fake news The piece survived for around five hours on BBC’s website before it was quietly amended. Fedorov was ‘demoted’ to a “pro-Kremlin commentator who frequently appears on Russian television,” yet no official retraction of the initial claim was made. The description, while still debatable, given that Fedorov is known for frequently spelling doom and gloom for Moscow, citing his purported high-ranking sources at home and overseas, is not explicitly untrue. The BBC also did not do a particularly good job of purging the fake, which survived on several of its platforms. A BBC Newsnight Facebook post on the matter still cryptically describes Fedorov as a “President Putin ally” at the moment of the publication, while its post on X claims the commentator “advises President Putin.” The BBC interview with Fedorov was spread across British media alongside his false depiction as a “Putin adviser.” Unlike the source, outlets that reprinted the fake news never bothered to amend it. Some outlets even managed to outperform the original. The Express, for instance, described Fedorov simultaneously as a “high-ranking Kremlin official” and “high-level Kremlin insider.” See the full article, with more screenshots of deceptive media, here: https://t.co/AgsMgon6cJ
- Sep 1, 20263.4x their median
🚨 Zelensky issues a warning: “Skies over Russia will close. I am warning every airline using Russian airspace, every insurance company, everyone flying into key Russian airports: the sky is becoming completely unsafe.” Adds that Ukraine is not targeting civil aviation as such - but says that “there is no room for civil aircraft among drones.” https://t.co/4YeA7kQCOF
- Sep 1, 20262.6x their median
“I believe we will build a Ukrainian state that will defend Europe and the entire civilized world. Glory to the Nation!” Says a deputy to Andriy Biletsky, the Azov founder, at the graduation ceremony for a school training propagandists for the Third Army Corps. So, to recap: neo-Nazis and extremists building a Führer-style organization, glorifying Bandera and Shukhevych, and drawing ideological inspiration from the legacy of the OUN and UPA — organizations associated with collaboration with Nazi Germany in the Holocaust and the mass killing of Poles and "bad Ukrainians" — now see themselves as Europe’s future defenders. Hear that, Poland? Relax. Your protectors have arrived! Though at this rate, Europe may soon find itself wondering who exactly it needs protection from: its enemies, or heavily armed extremists hardened by years of war, equipped with some of NATO’s finest toys, and convinced of Ukrainian ethnic superiority. History, apparently, has developed a taste for very dark comedy.
- Sep 1, 20262.5x their median
Leaked footage from the aftermath of the devestated NATO weapons store close to Kiev It's now believed more than 40 died when the Russians struck the depot, situated in the middle of a residential area Coming soon to the EU if the Warmongers in Brussels get their way https://t.co/KRpROjjg8T
- Sep 1, 20262.5x their median
ZELENSKİ: Rus hava sahasını kullanan her havayolunu uyarıyoruz. Ukrayna, genel anlamda sivil havacılığa veya herhangi bir sivil hava taşıtına bir tehdit oluşturmamaktadır. Ancak Rusya semalarındaki İHA’ların varlığı, bu durumun dikkate alınması gerektiği anlamına geliyor. https://t.co/JJXfM0QxE6
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 302 interactions against 369K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eksen, #sondaki̇ka.
- What is Ceyda Karan's engagement rate on X?
- Ceyda Karan (@ceydak) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 369,354 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.082%, Ceyda Karan sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ceydak have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ceydak post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.