Back to @centregoals's profile

CentreGoals. engagement report

@centregoals - 576K followers on X

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.12%
of 576K followers
Per impression
2.02%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
5.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
692
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.23/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 692 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CentreGoals.'s engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.12%, CentreGoals. sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202647x their median

    🚨🚨| NEW: Jürgen Klopp names Marc-André ter Stegen as his 𝐍𝐔𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐍𝐄 for Germany. 🧤🇩🇪 Klopp personally called ter Stegen to express his confidence in him. [@cfbayern] https://t.co/9Amzx1EpOm

    31K1.2K127225774K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202635x their median

    🚨🚨| OFFICIAL: Lionel Messi will be 𝐇𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐃 across Argentine football this weekend. Every match will 𝐏𝐀𝐔𝐒𝐄 in the 10th minute for a one-minute ovation celebrating his legendary career. 🩵🇦🇷 https://t.co/x2POyuctcy

    23K1.5K4530183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202634x their median

    🚨🚨| JUST IN: Cole Palmer has been 𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐃 by EA and had his Twitch stream taken down after streaming EA FC 27 before the embargo is lifted at 6PM BST. 😭🎮 https://t.co/AJE96RafCx

    23K51556921.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202630x their median

    🚨🚨| Paulo Dybala bags a 𝐇𝐀𝐓-𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐎𝐅 𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐒 for Roma against Fiorentina. 🎯🇦🇷 https://t.co/ufe6csCGjC

    20K7086765205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202630x their median

    🚨🚨| Former Premier League referee Mike Dean admits he played 𝐒𝐄𝐂𝐑𝐄𝐓 𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐒 during matches — including seeing how long he could go without blowing his whistle. 😳🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Dean claimed that he once went more than 20 minutes in a Premier League match without blowing his whistle and once managed to not leave the centre circle for about 15 minutes. [@TeleFootball]

    19K8061561871.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202621x their median

    🚨🚨🎙️| Cole Palmer on his EA FC 27 Rating: "I had one leg for 10 months, what the fuck you want me to do? You took 𝐓𝐖𝐎 𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 off me." 😭🎮 https://t.co/yrypCntou1

    14K4081727398K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202616x their median

    🚨🚨| 𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐃: William Saliba is the 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 player named in the PFA Premier League Team of the Year for four consecutive seasons. 🎖️🇫🇷 https://t.co/cGpS92D6oH

    9.7K9785290144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202616x their median

    🚨🚨| BREAKING: Aston Villa submit €𝟕𝟎𝐌 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑 for Nicolas Jackson, Chelsea on the verge of accepting. ⌛️🇸🇳 Personal terms with the striker still to be agreed. [@Santi_J_FM] https://t.co/nfky2go865

    10K449115231480K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202614x their median

    🚨🚨| Lionel Messi in his latest post on IG: https://t.co/Ed5y8JRDm7

    9.0K63497136337K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202613x their median

    🚨🚨🎙️| Bruno Fernandes on his PFA award vote: "I voted for an Arsenal player, I will not tell you who." https://t.co/QoLaPoPiKf

    9.0K262201197K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 692 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

What is CentreGoals.'s engagement rate on X?
CentreGoals. (@centregoals) has an engagement rate of 0.12%, based on the median interactions across 95 original posts from the last 30 days against 575,834 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.12%, CentreGoals. sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @centregoals have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @centregoals post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going