Back to @censor_net's profile

Цензор.НЕТ ✍️ engagement report

@censor_net - 195K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 195K followers
Per impression
1.93%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
41
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Цензор.НЕТ ✍️'s engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Цензор.НЕТ ✍️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202225x their median

    🔴 "Цензор.НЕТ" потребує вашої підтримки https://t.co/r1pwZQZ4ZQ Друзі! Ми потребуємо вашої фінансової підтримки для подальшої роботи Цензор.НЕТ. Кожен текст, фото і відео з передової - створюються завдяки вашій небайдужості до роботи нашої команди. https://t.co/fZqJWCuLhJ

    49116335710View on X
  • Oct 9, 202619x their median

    Єврокомісія зробила зауваження Україні щодо продовження фінансування телемарафону, - проєкт звіту https://t.co/3vXpRrTVB8 https://t.co/vdWmNlut7A

    60512635812K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202616x their median

    "Ми спалимо їхні НПЗ": Україна продовжить удари по російській нафтопереробці, - FT https://t.co/jmmeI3IQIq https://t.co/dSb1BbpC6F

    554654346.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202611x their median

    Україна має відмовитися від радянських методів та створити нову доктрину ведення війни, - Залужний https://t.co/MQhow0BM9e https://t.co/yRgtoi4qek

    26742147129.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20269.0x their median

    Детонація в селі Мила на Київщині: підозрюваний посадовець СБУ вніс заставу у 499 200 грн і вийшов https://t.co/bBmvceTz35 https://t.co/BbSdoBQRY4

    19612134188.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.7x their median

    Деокуповано село Середнє на Донеччині, окупантів відкинули біля Шандриголового, - DeepState https://t.co/wYZce4Hj0s https://t.co/Mu4sHqKcuj

    28827103.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20266.0x their median

    Сенатори США про дозвіл Трампа на купівлю російського дизелю: Це повна зрада України https://t.co/Cshpi386KW https://t.co/LLD7OQr5A1

    181362834.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.4x their median

    Атаки дронів у РФ: горить НПЗ "Роснафти", у Таганрозі вибухи https://t.co/VnnbWnVfUA https://t.co/Lyi1jfmBeN

    19128202.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20265.3x their median

    Дрони атакували Ростов: спалахнула масштабна пожежа на нафтоналивному терміналі https://t.co/huW2Ua8kak https://t.co/DnP7W8DYKq

    19419602.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.7x their median

    Велика Британія підтвердила підтримку України після угоди Трампа з Путіним щодо дизелю https://t.co/YB0lbpBLCP https://t.co/fAeP54pkY8

    137203613.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Цензор.НЕТ ✍️'s engagement rate on X?
Цензор.НЕТ ✍️ (@censor_net) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Цензор.НЕТ ✍️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @censor_net have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @censor_net post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going