Back to @cenkuygur's profile

Cenk Uygur engagement report

@cenkuygur - 896K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.218%
of 896K followers
Per impression
3.48%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
6.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 896K followers, an engagement rate of 0.218%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 34% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cenk Uygur's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.218%, Cenk Uygur sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 293 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202614x their median

    Trump says Kennedy Center can’t re-open unless his name is on it. Has there ever been a more petty bitch?

    24K1.6K85041333K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    Congrats, Israel! We're back into full-scale war with Iran. They did it again! In a wild coincidence, in a government stuffed with hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes from Israeli lobby, we're doing exacty what Israel wants. More dead Americans and billions wasted to come!

    21K3.3K1.0K84339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202613x their median

    I just talked to Jewish-American and Muslim-American doctors who were in Gaza and featured in the movie American Doctor. They explained how many kids were shot in the head and chest by Israeli snipers. They're murdering the kids on purpose. 83% of American doctors who went to Gaza reported a child assassinated by a sniper with either a head or chest shot - every single day they were there. They're murdering the children on purpose. One of the doctors explained that when Israel surrounds a hospital, bombs it, raids it and shuts it down, they purposely destroy all the life saving equipment. In the hospital he was in, they destroyed the incubators, and eight babies died without them. We are being forced to finance a fascist country committing a genocide, while the monsters in our government and media pretend it isn't happening.

    18K6.0K869144299K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202611x their median

    I've never seen anything like this Michigan race. The Democratic Party is attacking its own candidate! In an absolutely pivotal race! I've seen more Democrats on TV attacking @AbdulElSayed than I've seen Democrats taking on GOP. Dems are attacking him more than Republicans are!

    18K2.4K2.0K186377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202611x their median

    Trump is planning to give Israel another $2.8 billion in bombs! This is 100% PAID FOR BY US TAXPAYERS! And these are “genocide bombs” - 2,000 pound bombs that destroy entire civilian buildings at a time. 40,000 of them! WHY ARE WE BEING FORCED TO PAY FOR THEIR GENOCIDE? Fuck No!!

    16K3.8K70885169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20269.7x their median

    It’d be easy for me to criticize and ridicule @laurenboebert over the sexual allegations against her. Instead, I’ll point out she was one of four Republicans who originally voted to release the Epstein Files. Those people got put on a permanent list for political destruction.

    17K1.5K34444604K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20269.5x their median

    If tomorrow we weren't allies with Israel, all of our wars in the Middle East would end immediately. Remind me again how being allies with the bullies of the region who oppress and humiliate their neighbors is helpful to American interests. Why is this fiction pushed on us 24/7?

    14K2.5K1.9K145362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20269.2x their median

    If someone told you God whispered in their ear 3,000 years ago that all of your stuff actually belonged to them, and that they had to drive you out of your home and take it for themselves, you'd call the police because you're talking to a dangerous psycopath.

    14K2.6K955107405K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20269.2x their median

    Saudi Arabia is pissed we’re not helping them when they’re under attack by the Houthis and others. They made the dumb, dumb mistake of thinking we would help anyone but Israel. Do they not know our government isn’t our own? We serve Israel over our own citizens, let alone Saudis.

    15K2.0K86277441K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.5x their median

    Haley Stevens just called Bernie Sanders a jihadi against Jews. He's Jewish, she's not. This is one of my favorite predictions, I said that by the end of the 2020 campaign, they'd call Bernie an antisemite. And, of course, they did. Because that pony only has one trick.

    15K1.6K42441195K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 896K followers, an engagement rate of 0.218%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 34% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Cenk Uygur's engagement rate on X?
Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) has an engagement rate of 0.218%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 896,104 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.218%, Cenk Uygur sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cenkuygur have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cenkuygur post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going