Back to @cctv_videos's profile

CCTV X engagement report

@cctv_videos - 271K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.954%
of 271K followers
Per impression
2.08%
124K views on a typical post
Reach
45.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
52 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 271K followers, an engagement rate of 0.954%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 124K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CCTV X's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.954%, CCTV X sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 77 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202614x their median

    https://t.co/KQkyZ1Iqnv

    35K1.5K327882.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.2x their median

    The moment a man is born https://t.co/ESNg2Yx4rC

    17K1.2K11460315K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20266.4x their median

    He made her day https://t.co/0VnVSyFpHR

    16K757133611.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20266.3x their median

    A man, likely a father of a daughter, approached the guy who was assaulting a woman in the middle of the street and put him in his place. https://t.co/lWH6nAqug7

    15K73813422536K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20265.2x their median

    Task failed successfully. 🀣 https://t.co/mHnXSN4rBC

    13K857115491.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.9x their median

    She put her hands on a guy, and this happened https://t.co/C2x9YVOYr3

    12K44254046522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.5x their median

    The way that last lady stood up you knew she would bring it πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/gggGiNpPjE

    11K3338615704K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.9x their median

    A man was harassing a woman in the elevator. See what she did. https://t.co/iytlfgCISM

    9.3K56510911141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.9x their median

    A guy kept bothering an elderly man for no reason whatsoever, ends up getting both his and his friends ass beat by his grandchildren. https://t.co/XD6ZtJsnMz

    4.6K179474242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.6x their median

    See how shameless he is ! He’s farting in public see how people reacts on his act 😱😱 https://t.co/NhAoMG7rIa

    3.8K181435181K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 271K followers, an engagement rate of 0.954%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 124K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is CCTV X's engagement rate on X?
CCTV X (@cctv_videos) has an engagement rate of 0.954%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 271,093 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.954%, CCTV X sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cctv_videos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cctv_videos post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going