Back to @ccifuentes's profile

Cristina Cifuentes engagement report

@ccifuentes - 276K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.359%
of 276K followers
Per impression
1.07%
93K views on a typical post
Reach
33.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
993
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 993 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.359%. Posts are seen about 93K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 8.7x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #mediodíarne.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.359%, Cristina Cifuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 224 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 14, 20258.7x their median

    La turba que lincha con aparente motivo o sin él, sea cual sea, ahora o en la larga historia de la Humanidad, nunca está formada por moros o cristianos, fascistas o demócratas, rojos o azules, sino por quienes se amparan en el número para desahogar su vileza y su infamia. https://t.co/chGw5owOoN

    6.8K1.4K42377432K viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 20268.2x their median

    ¿Por qué los fascistas atacan a mujeres de izquierdas? Porque saben que los nuevos liderazgos políticos y mediáticos frente a la ultraderecha son liderazgos feministas. El miedo tiene que cambiar de bando. #MalasLenguas https://t.co/IcyLPHf2dZ

    4.6K2.0K1.5K55138K viewsView on X
  • Mar 14, 2026

    🙀 RÉCORD HISTÓRICO para @EnBocaDe_Todos 👊 BRUTAL 9.7% de share 📢 +58% por encima de @cuatro. WOW!! #QueVivaLaTele #Audiencias https://t.co/aczjPCRxpy

    1.1K14011327366K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    🔴Dos militares españoles, ingresados en el Gómez Ulla tras ser agredidos por marroquíes en Ceuta ✍️ Informa @Villarejo https://t.co/UGhPY1WL6o

    630414495098K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 2026

    Celebrando la suerte de ser tu madre. Feliz cumpleaños, querida hija. ❤️🎂 París, como testigo. #8Marzo #8M https://t.co/FkfcpQ2WTR

    9053631258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Indignada tras aparecer en la “lista negra” del Ministerio del Interior, clasificando a quienes opinamos en los medios según nuestra orientación política. Es intolerable que nos fichen y señalen ideológicamente. No lo normalizo porque en democracia, es cruzar una línea gravísima. https://t.co/dgipx1lxcV

    62013877887K viewsView on X
  • Feb 12, 2026

    Me uno a la iniciativa “pañuelo Challenge” de la Fundación Aladina, para apoyar a los niños enfermos de cáncer.♥️ @FundAladina #pañuelochallengealadina https://t.co/WDzmgqBCa6 https://t.co/8fvkllfmmb

    29241037.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 2026

    🌍 Hoy, 30 de junio, en el #DíaMundialArtrogriposis, me sumo a quienes trabajan para dar visibilidad a esta enfermedad rara, impulsar la investigación y apoyar a las personas que conviven con ella. Porque conocer es el primer paso para comprender. 💙 #VidasConArtrogriposis https://t.co/QXs04B9Xr2

    5713004.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 2026

    💚Hoy es el Día mundial de la concienciación sobre el Autismo. Por un mundo más accesible, justo y respetuoso con las personas autistas. #DiaMundialAutismo #SomosInfinitos https://t.co/9x6p3NQrln

    133201.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mediodíarne

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 993 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.359%. Posts are seen about 93K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 8.7x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Cristina Cifuentes's engagement rate on X?
Cristina Cifuentes (@ccifuentes) has an engagement rate of 0.359%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 276,171 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.359%, Cristina Cifuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ccifuentes have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ccifuentes post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going