CATALINA CRUZ engagement report
@catalina1 - 261K followers on X
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.45%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 8.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.8K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
CATALINA CRUZ's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.45%, CATALINA CRUZ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 20265.0x their median
Date gusto https://t.co/rW8jdTrwHX https://t.co/kVfCTNe9bJ
- Aug 27, 20264.4x their median
¿Dejarían salir a su pareja con este jean? 👀 https://t.co/fxznMJswxo
- Jun 13, 20264.4x their median
🇺🇸🔥 Hoy mi corazón futbolero estuvo con Estados Unidos ⚽😎 https://t.co/0D1mmO0E0V
- Sep 8, 20263.5x their median
Oye @grok, convierte mi foto a la década de los 80. ¿Cómo me vería? Mantén mi cara. https://t.co/CerlC3CfuM
- Sep 1, 20263.5x their median
Buenas tardes 🤗 https://t.co/nv9GW7kD2S
- Sep 4, 20263.3x their median
De todas mis fotos esta tiene algo especial definitivamente es mi favorita. https://t.co/2wbIPOY7t7
- Aug 28, 20263.1x their median
A simple vista parecen resistentes, pero la verdadera prueba será cuando les toque soportarlo todo. ¿Aguantarán esas dos varillas? https://t.co/ueEJd0roCx
- Sep 5, 20263.0x their median
Dos outfits, dos estilos ¿con cuál prefieren verme: en la bicicleta o en la estática? https://t.co/XOHje93h9P
- Sep 6, 20262.9x their median
Mañana habrá otra oportunidad para sorprender al mundo. https://t.co/GvKfEeGB3S
- Aug 29, 20262.7x their median
Por tener OnlyFans me han cerrado muchas puertas, pero también me atreví a abrir caminos que jamás imaginé recorrer. Hoy soy más libre, fuerte y segura de mí misma 🚪👉👇 https://t.co/rW8jdTrwHX https://t.co/KUDW8InF5f
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.45%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 8.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.8K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
- What is CATALINA CRUZ's engagement rate on X?
- CATALINA CRUZ (@catalina1) has an engagement rate of 0.45%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 260,927 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.45%, CATALINA CRUZ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @catalina1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @catalina1 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.