Back to @carteiroreaca's profile

Gil Diniz engagement report

@carteiroreaca - 600K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.123%
of 600K followers
Per impression
6.82%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
1.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
738
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 738 interactions against 600K followers, an engagement rate of 0.123%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 6.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gil Diniz's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.123%, Gil Diniz sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 597 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 202636x their median

    A esquerda faz o "diabo pelo poder". Eu não esperava nada diferente. Cabe a nós combater a mentira com a verdade. Compartilhem! https://t.co/uHpsP5uo92

    19K6.7K598202171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    Vamo agilizar essa parada aí moçada. Voto útil no Flávio Bolsonaro já no 1º turno. https://t.co/Tgd9F8fXRA

    10K3.1K50967411K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202616x their median

    Obrigado, meus amigos! Fui ELEITO Deputado Federal pelo Estado de São Paulo e agora a Missão é em Brasília! Obrigado pelos votos, obrigado pelo empenho de cada um aqui que tem me apoiado nesse processo! Obrigado, @BolsonaroSP pela confiança! Vou honrar com muito trabalho o que você fez e faz por mim!

    9.3K2.1K6065139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20266.5x their median

    Agora, que seremos maioria no senado e câmara, ala do STF quer buscar diálogo para impedir o impeachment de ministros? A cara nem queima! Para resgatar o Brasil, libertar Bolsonaro e todos os presos políticos, precisamos agora eleger Flávio Bolsonaro 22 https://t.co/laygnxomso

    3.5K1.1K1274518K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20266.4x their median

    Na vitória ou na derrota: Deus é bom o tempo todo! https://t.co/JJ72pdkbL1

    4.1K473144930K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20266.4x their median

    Sou muito grato a Deus pelos rumos que minha vida toma. Vim de Pernambuco a São Paulo, me tornei carteiro, conheci Eduardo e Carlos Bolsonaro, em 2014, enquanto ambos panfletavam na rua. Fiz amizade com eles, depois me tornei assessor de Eduardo e enfim Deputado Estadual. E agora vivi mais uma emoção marcante, na inauguração da Casa da Direita, em Piracicaba, quando um telão transmitiu a mensagem do meu grande irmão de lutas, Eduardo. Foi um momento extremamente marcante e impactante. Agradeço do fundo do coração por essa confiança histórica, meu amigo e líder @BolsonaroSP . Farei até o impossível para representar os bolsonaristas em Brasília!

    3.6K1.0K98932K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.3x their median

    A situação ficou insustentável. É preciso que o Senado assuma seu papel e não se omita. A postura de Alcolumbre envergonha o Brasil.

    3.9K2964683372K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20266.0x their median

    Os brasileiros, no último domingo, foram às urnas e, mais uma vez, deram exemplo de maturidade democrática. Mais de 125 milhões de cidadãos exerceram o direito fundamental ao voto. As eleições foram organizadas de maneira absolutamente escorreita e tudo transcorreu de forma tranquila, sem intercorrências que comprometessem a votação. Poucas horas depois do encerramento, a Justiça Eleitoral já divulgava os resultados. A eficiência da apuração foi destacada, inclusive, pelo Presidente dos Estados Unidos, em publicação na qual, por um pequeno equívoco, atribuiu à Índia a eleição realizada no Brasil. Houve disputas acirradas, algumas definidas por margem mínima, tendo sido respeitado o resultado das urnas. Um bom exemplo é o Paraná, onde o governador eleito obteve 50,10% dos votos válidos, apenas 0,10 ponto percentual acima do necessário para vencer no primeiro turno. Chama a atenção o fato de nenhuma liderança política de expressão ter questionado esse tipo de resultado, obtido por meio do mesmo sistema de votação eletrônica utilizado nas eleições de 2018 e 2022, que, além de auditável, assegura o sigilo do voto e evita velhas práticas fraudulentas. O sucesso na organização das eleições torna-se ainda mais admirável diante dos desafios logísticos de um país de dimensões continentais. Mais de 560 mil urnas foram distribuídas aos mais de 5,5 mil municípios brasileiros, por estradas, rios e aeronaves, alcançando inclusive comunidades rurais, aldeias indígenas, comunidades quilombolas e áreas remotas, com o apoio das Forças Armadas. Trata-se de demonstração da notável capacidade institucional da Justiça Eleitoral. Nesse ensejo, enalteço a Justiça Eleitoral, os mesários, os eleitores que compareceram à votação e a própria urna eletrônica, como instrumento voltado à concretização da democracia com transparência, celeridade e segurança. No dia 25 de outubro, voltaremos às urnas para o segundo turno das eleições para Presidente da República e, em seis estados e no Distrito Federal, para Governador.

    877593.4K93317K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20265.9x their median

    Em coletiva de imprensa, Flávio Bolsonaro demonstrou total confiança no projeto de reconstrução do Brasil e fez duras críticas ao cenário atual sob a gestão do PT. Flávio destacou a insatisfação popular diante das marcas negativas acumuladas pelo governo de Lula, apontando o aumento constante da violência, o retorno de escândalos de corrupção e a carga tributária sufocante sobre a população. Além disso, cobrou Moraes em relação ao pedido feito para que possa voltar a visitar seu pai, Jair Bolsonaro. As palavras de Flávio refletem com precisão o sentimento do cidadão de bem que não aguenta mais ver o país refém do caos e do desmandos do sistema. No próximo dia 25, você tem a última chance para mudar o Brasil: vote Flávio Bolsonaro Presidente - 22!

    3.4K95827716K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20265.8x their median

    Meu muito obrigado aos 63398 mil paulistas que confiaram o voto em mim. Honrarei em Brasília a confiança que depositaram em mim. Agora e seguir firme para eleger Flávio Bolsonaro presidente e resgatar nosso Brasil. 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷 https://t.co/Aw54rYaP74

    3.4K6671911316K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 738 interactions against 600K followers, an engagement rate of 0.123%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 6.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Gil Diniz's engagement rate on X?
Gil Diniz (@carteiroreaca) has an engagement rate of 0.123%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 599,679 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.123%, Gil Diniz sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @carteiroreaca have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @carteiroreaca post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going