Back to @carlbildt's profile

Carl Bildt engagement report

@carlbildt - 731K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 731K followers
Per impression
1.08%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
3.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
286
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 286 interactions against 731K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bosnia, #breaking, #carlbildt.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bosnia, #breaking, #carlbildt.

Compared with accounts its own size

Carl Bildt's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, Carl Bildt sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 202 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202675x their median

    The three Kings of Norway πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄, Denmark πŸ‡©πŸ‡° and Sweden πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ in Oslo today. We belong together in the Nordic world. https://t.co/zdHszdem9T

    20K1.2K17883527K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202624x their median

    Peter Armstrong on the collapse of Canada-US trade talks: "There will be books written about what happened tonight." https://t.co/Hcw9nJK4Yl

    5.3K903527121499K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202619x their median

    In connection with πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Air Force 100 Year Anniversary Saab unveils a concept of the A3 unmanned stealth drone. And the A1 larger test platform is expected to fly already next year. https://t.co/ixX3gR9o3h

    4.7K6598167140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202615x their median

    Opinion: The lessons Israel has learned in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran apply to Turkey as well. From Idlib to Istanbul, Israel will attack, if necessary, not defend. https://t.co/GPFavGrB3P

    2.2K4871.3K3271.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.1x their median

    There is an intense election campaign ongoing. But as a young girl is murdered in a school attack the PM Ulf Kristersson and the opposition leader Magdalena Andersson stop everything and come together in lighting a candle in the memory of the girl. That’s πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ. https://t.co/QlC0AcHWF4

    1.6K12948653K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.4x their median

    Not entirely surprising that Trump πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ has invited Putin πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί to the G20 summit in Miami. I think European G20 members should make their participation in the meeting conditional on Trump inviting also Zelenskyy πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ as a guest.

    1.3K180771335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.9x their median

    It’s a fairly remarkable Trump climbdown over πŸ‡¬πŸ‡±. He says that the agreement prevents πŸ‡·πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ military bases there, but that was neither an issue nor a possibility. And as for extended πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ military presence that was already possible under the 1951 agreement. For other issues we will wait until the full text is available next week.

    1.1K184781160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.8x their median

    Very impressive military parade in Kyiv πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ today. Unmanned vehicles and drones shows the impressive ability of the country to develop new defence technologies. https://t.co/UHcJFaafxb

    1.1K160511135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.7x their median

    Very few nations can show the depth of experience with designing, building and operating advanced fighters that πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ can. And it is of course based on the technological and industrial strength of the nation. https://t.co/Abhm16n1yu

    1.2K11739339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    The Director CIA πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ taking off from Riga πŸ‡±πŸ‡» after having spent a couple of hours in Moscow πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί. He certainly saw his counterpart at SVR there, but most likely also conveyed his message also to higher echelons. https://t.co/YmkoSlkvTO

    1.0K1986016129K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bosnia#breaking#carlbildt#efa26#gzeroeurope

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 286 interactions against 731K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bosnia, #breaking, #carlbildt.

What is Carl Bildt's engagement rate on X?
Carl Bildt (@carlbildt) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 730,607 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, Carl Bildt sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @carlbildt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @carlbildt post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going