Back to @caocaolabs's profile

曹操 engagement report

@caocaolabs - 99K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 99K followers
Per impression
0.214%
1.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.214% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 151K interactions, about 150653x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

曹操's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, 曹操 sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 79 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 29, 2025150653x their median

    Just saw this in a conference room at Tesla Global Engineering HQ in Palo Alto https://t.co/yaSvLADIlv

    134K8.7K6.8K76020M viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 2025

    This chicken is sloppy when incubating and the other chicken warns it https://t.co/cIYHOmwXrI

    26K1.7K2681741.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 2025

    Send Grokipedia links to your friends and family Tell them that Grokipedia has the highest accuracy for any information they find online... Because it's corrected and fact-checked and has no human bias... built only pursue the Truth https://t.co/mKbMKyNmpX

    2.5K5635571275.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261401x their median

    Si sientes que necesitas REINICIAR TU VIDA, NUNCA empieces por: ・Mudarte ・Dejar tu trabajo ・Desaparecer de las redes En su lugar, empieza por ↓

    2.5K3102712821K viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 20252476x their median

    ╔═╦═╦╗ ║╬║║║║ ╠╗╠╩═╝ ╚═╝

    1.5K12079035341K viewsView on X
  • Jan 15, 20181031x their median

    $40,000,000 USD, gone! https://t.co/uJh7Xl2d3O

    1.3K42319991View on X
  • Oct 28, 20252012x their median

    我有一只正宗的虎皮鹦鹉! https://t.co/JQEgi1UxmF

    1.8K631095152K viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 2025868x their median

    Why did President Trump pardon Binance founder @cz_binance? Was there any pay-to-play involved in this pardon? These are important questions being asked by many people, so I sat down with @teresagoody (CZ's lawyer) and asked her all the important questions. Enjoy! YouTube: https://t.co/ca29KXfBIF Spotify: https://t.co/glYJ2YJFEY Apple: https://t.co/R5paYKmvpw TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Intro 0:57 - What was CZ charged with and why was he pardoned? 3:51 - How does the pardon process work? 7:38 - Was there pay-to-play or corruption involved? 12:03 - Other chains, other CEOs, and the bitcoin-wallet rumors 16:05 - How did CZ handle all of this personally? 18:34 - Elizabeth Warren’s claims — what happened? 23:10 - Is crypto policy now a political pendulum? 24:57 - What happens to Binance now?

    5299522618929K viewsView on X
  • Nov 3, 2025735x their median

    11月3日 okb 135 本文由 #BCGAME 赞助|@bcgame https://t.co/VmARu0sl0a

    3381135828276K viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 2025

    经多方消息源证实,Solana 今天下午在深圳的线下活动,遇到了多名当地警察的询问。 参与现场活动的人士,向博主本人透露:在活动开始后不久,几位警察从电梯口突然出现,并寻找现场工作人员,进行沟通。 随后人群,在看到警察出现后,自觉散场,主办方之后也在现场协调,让人群离开。 媒体吴说,也证实了这一消息。 有趣的是,昨天中国央行行长表示,下一步将联合多政府部门,加大打击对境内虚拟货币的经营和炒作,同时密切跟踪、动态评估境外稳定币的发展,疑似内地监管升级。

    4754314732285K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.214% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 151K interactions, about 150653x its own typical post.

What is 曹操's engagement rate on X?
曹操 (@caocaolabs) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,481 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, 曹操 sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @caocaolabs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @caocaolabs post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going