Back to @canardenchaine's profile

Le Canard enchaîné engagement report

@canardenchaine - 877K followers on X

Measured over 110 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 877K followers
Per impression
1.15%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
324
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 324 interactions against 877K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 110 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 110 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

Measured over 110 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Le Canard enchaîné's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, Le Canard enchaîné sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 406 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 202642x their median

    Bally Bagayoko n’est pas le seul ! La RATP a fait bénéficier à 200 élus d’un emploi à temps plein, mais pas trop prenant, pour les aider à exercer facilement leur mandat en échange de leur soutien. Une information « que tout le monde connaît », admet le député LFI de Paris Rodrigo Arenas. Surtout depuis que « Le Canard » l’a publiée. https://t.co/EvtLeaPS5s

    8.2K3.9K1.0K5132.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202635x their median

    Depuis les révélations du « Canard » sur l’emploi à plein temps accordé par la RATP à Bally Bagayoko, Jean-Luc Mélenchon et plusieurs cadres LFI s’en prennent au Palmipède en se gardant bien d’évoquer le fond de l’affaire : un échange de bons procédés qui a permis à l’élu de bénéficier d’un boulot pas trop prenant, et à la Régie de disposer d’un relais politique en Seine-Saint-Denis. Pour faire diversion, rien ne vaut le bruit et la fureur ! ➡ https://t.co/q0hMHXzPmm

    7.6K2.4K1.0K170470K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202614x their median

    🔴 « Le Canard » a mis la palme sur un rapport encore confidentiel d’une mission de l’Education nationale qui devait faire la lumière sur le scandale du périscolaire à Paris.  La mission a découvert que la personne en charge de recruter les animateurs avait demandé aux parents de garder secrète la suspension du responsable éducatif de l’école après une plainte contre X pour agression sexuelle. La maternelle abritait aussi deux autres pédocriminels présumés.  Comment en est-on arrivé là ? https://t.co/b26pUaFbSG

    2.9K1.7K9275200K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202613x their median

    Depuis les articles du « Canard » sur l’emploi exercé à la RATP par Bally Bagayoko avant son élection à la mairie de Saint-Denis, le Palmipède est attaqué pour des choses qu’il n’a pas écrites.  Reste des questions simples. L’élu Insoumis a-t-il oui ou non bénéficié d’un traitement de faveur pour décrocher son emploi à la RATP ? La Régie l’a-t-elle oui ou non rémunéré en douce durant une partie du temps consacré à l’exercice de ses mandats ? « Le Canard » revient sur le dossier après avoir contacté à nouveau le principal intéressé ⤵ https://t.co/vEN4Rg8dIT

    2.7K96036554239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20269.9x their median

    La nièce est de retour au RN ! Et ce n’est sûrement pas dû à ses réussites : une veste aux municipales en 2014, une autre aux régionales de 2015, un ralliement raté à Zemmour en 2022, sans parler de son école sans étudiants ou presque et de son think tank qui ne réfléchit pas à grand-chose… Qu’importe, pour Marine Le Pen, ces retrouvailles sont une bonne occasion de rappeler à Jordan Bardella que c’est le clan Le Pen qui fait la loi au RN. https://t.co/1KIcRyIFLJ

    2.1K90016852112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20269.6x their median

    La fraude à l’assurance maladie « provient essentiellement de professionnels de santé ». C’est la conclusion principale d’un rapport de l’Inspection des finances et l’Igas mis en ligne fin juillet. Une information que le gouvernement gardait bien au chaud depuis plus d'un an. ➡ https://t.co/nsWXepyDAf

    1.8K1.1K1006595K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.2x their median

    💬 « On a l’impression que quelque chose nous échappe. » Sans blague ! A Matignon on n’en mène pas large après le vol de données fiscales de 700 000 Français. D’autant plus que les problèmes étaient connus. Au moins deux rapports publiés ces dernières années et exhumés par « Le Canard » avertissaient Bercy de « failles structurelles » et de « faiblesses liées à l’ancienneté » du matériel et des logiciels utilisés. Des milliards d'euros ont pourtant été dépensés dans la sécurité, sans grand effet… ➡ https://t.co/jlnqywqZSQ

    1.5K7814738101K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20267.2x their median

    L'eau potable de trois villages savoyards est polluée à l’uranium. L’ARS, au courant dès le mois d’avril, n’a réagi et prononcé une interdiction de consommer l’eau du robinet qu’avec plusieurs mois de retard. Mise au pied du mur, l’Agence répond benoîtement aujourd’hui qu’« aucune alerte automatique » ne lui a « été transmise » par les instruments de mesure. Vous reprendrez bien un verre de sirop d’uranium ? https://t.co/dQdJiDplxw

    1.3K924435345K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.1x their median

    50 kits de dégustation de vin de Blaye, une bouteille de champagne à 88 euros, 3 941 euros de chauffeur privé… 240 000 euros de factures de la campagne des européennes de 2024 ne seront pas remboursés à Jordan Bardella et au RN. Ainsi en a décidé la justice. Ces frais ont été jugés sans lien avec la course aux électeurs. ➡ https://t.co/rX7JW2VJdo

    1.5K6758949151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.4x their median

    💬 « Il ne peut pas affirmer qu’il ignorait qu’une telle opération était répréhensible », écrit la cour d’appel de Douai qui vient de confirmer la condamnation d’Alain Griset, l’ex-sous-ministre de Macron aux PME. L’intéressé était accusé d’avoir viré 130 000 euros du syndicat professionnel qu’il dirigeait vers son propre PEA. Pourquoi se gêner ? ➡ https://t.co/ZP60OYICiQ

    1.3K702263361K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 324 interactions against 877K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 110 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 110 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

What is Le Canard enchaîné's engagement rate on X?
Le Canard enchaîné (@canardenchaine) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 110 original posts from the last 30 days against 876,661 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, Le Canard enchaîné sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @canardenchaine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @canardenchaine post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going