Back to @camilladelucas's profile

Camilla de Lucas ⭐️ engagement report

@camilladelucas - 2.7M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.382%
of 2.7M followers
Per impression
13.1%
78K views on a typical post
Reach
2.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 10K interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 13.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 267K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.382%, Camilla de Lucas ⭐️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 273 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 22, 202626x their median

    Valeu, galera, pela oportunidade! Segundo lugaaar. 🧡 https://t.co/36oBy9ZvhD

    245K18K2.1K1.7K11M viewsView on X
  • May 5, 202112x their median

    Valeu, galera, pela oportunidade! Segundo lugaaar. ❤️ https://t.co/sXXAlMdiYv

    112K4.3K2.1K2.7KView on X
  • Jan 9, 20257.0x their median

    2021 elas fizeram minha trança pra entrar no bbb 2025 elas entraram no bbb https://t.co/Lshk01PyjH

    69K1.4K1763511.1M viewsView on X
  • Feb 13, 20253.3x their median

    Esse BBB é tão cinema que uma hora dessa a Juliette com a Camilla estavam segurando o Gil Do Vigor que gritava " Me bota no Paredão" Que treta Big Brother Brasil #BBB25 https://t.co/h7EOF7DJRm

    31K1.4K3157062.1M viewsView on X
  • Dec 29, 20253.2x their median

    e a camilla de lucas que recebeu uma dm racista e aí a pessoa entrou em pânico que foi exposta e falou que foi “hackeada”? 🤡🤡🤡 é de cair o cu da bunda https://t.co/m9VuoWVbHc

    31K8452273201.3M viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 20252.2x their median

    AAAAAAA AUMENTA O PREMIO QUE TA POUCO!

    22K1.2K10966695K viewsView on X
  • Jan 13, 2026

    Quero 10% de quem ganhar, pq eu que pedi pra aumentarem o prêmio. https://t.co/dBPbzhFdy6

    17K85710753229K viewsView on X
  • Feb 18, 20251.7x their median

    30 semanas… pouquíssimo tempo que falta pra parir… entrou em gotas e vai sair em quilos🤯✨🥹🙏🏾🤯🥴🤧💌 https://t.co/582IGJmgoL

    15K4603461.6K7.9M viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 2025

    eu amo que essa figurinha serve pra várias situações 🗣️🗣️🗣️ https://t.co/L6gZ6r2q7i

    14K4024327645K viewsView on X
  • Feb 26, 2025

    Juro, meu sonho é aprender a dar os pulinhos 🗣️🗣️🗣️ https://t.co/EdMYZfzgVs

    12K16310173589K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10K interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 13.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 267K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Camilla de Lucas ⭐️'s engagement rate on X?
Camilla de Lucas ⭐️ (@camilladelucas) has an engagement rate of 0.382%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,668,720 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.382%, Camilla de Lucas ⭐️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @camilladelucas have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @camilladelucas post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going