Back to @c9ttt's profile

جداريات engagement report

@c9ttt - 280K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 280K followers
Per impression
0.35%
9.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.15%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

جداريات's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, جداريات sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 213 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202634x their median

    قلت للنجّار يسوي لي هالدولاب، وهذا اللي طلع لي بالنهاية 😅 أستلمه كذا ولا أرجعه ؟ https://t.co/nEJi7jdmRj

    948361121574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202612x their median

    وش الفرق بين اللهب الأزرق والأحمر في موقد الغاز ؟ https://t.co/lI72aOdod6

    31215392249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.7x their median

    من الخاص : أمس زوجي كان مسافر شغل. لما رجع، كنت بأحط جاكيته في الغسالة، ولقيت هذا في جيبه. أحد يعرف وش هذا يقدر يساعدني ؟ https://t.co/0nmwTKUXiK

    26917153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    ❌ وجهات أوروبية مشهورة لكن بتجنبها : ・فينيسيا 🇮🇹 — رهيبة، لكن متعبة ・برشلونة 🇪🇸 — زحمة بشكل مبالغ فيه ・سانتوريني 🇬🇷 — المنظر الخرافي يجي معه زحمة كبيرة ・فلورنسا 🇮🇹 — جميلة جدًا، لكن مزدحمة ・لشبونة 🇵🇹 — ما عادت رخيصة مثل أول ・مدريد 🇪🇸 — مدينة عظيمة، لكنها مو خياري المفضل لو بسافر إسبانيا ・براغ 🇨🇿 — جميلة، لكن صارت سياحية أكثر وأكثر ✅ ٧ أماكن أختارها بدلها ↓🧵

    1919108.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    كلكم تعرفون وش يعني كل لون في الواتساب، صح؟ https://t.co/MRJH46Suzp

    21134030K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    يا بنات، تذكروا هالكلام زين: • الرجل اللي يتأكد من الحجز قبلها بيوم • الرجل اللي ما يتنرفز وهو واقف بالطابور • الرجل اللي يكلم حتى الأصغر منه باحترام • الرجل اللي يقدر يقول غلطه من نفسه أول • الرجل اللي ما يبالغ ويسوي أشياء محد طلبها منه غالبًا يكون كذا :

    316109.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    إذا عمرك حاليًا بين ٢٥ و٣٢، اقرأ الكلام هذا كويس: https://t.co/cOEy6BbqoN

    2411105.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    كثير من مستخدمين الآيفون ما يدرون أصلًا إن هالميزة موجودة، لدرجة إنهم ما فكروا يستخدمونها حتى. https://t.co/Zq9OVtIfd6

    1223005.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    عندي صديقة عمرها ٣٨ سنة، وفيه واحد عمره ٢٦ متقدم لها وناوي يخطبها. واللي حكت لي عنه الحين هو بالضبط السبب اللي يخليني ما أتحمس لشخص أصغر مني. قبل يومين، قال لها إن عنده عشاء عمل وما يقدر يشوفها. هي شافت الموضوع عادي. بعد ساعتين، شافت في حالة واتساب لبنت صورة لها مع نفس الشخص اللي متقدم لها. والواضح إن الموضوع مو مجرد معرفة عادية...

    1518105.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    سؤال مقابلة في شركة مشهورة! دخل رجل محل ذهب وسرق ٥٠٠ ريال. بعدها اشترى من نفس المحل ذهب بقيمة ٣٢٠ ريال باستخدام نفس الـ٥٠٠ ريال المسروقة. وأخذ ١٨٠ ريال باقي. كم إجمالي خسارة محل الذهب؟

    14416017K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

What is جداريات's engagement rate on X?
جداريات (@c9ttt) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,758 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, جداريات sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @c9ttt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @c9ttt post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going