Back to @burak's profile

Burak Bayburtlu engagement report

@burak - 128K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 128K followers
Per impression
0.096%
1.0K views on a typical post
Reach
0.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 0.096% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.819% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 41705x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #boycottedsheeran, #dhhiszionist, #i̇stanbul.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #boycottedsheeran, #dhhiszionist, #i̇stanbul.

Compared with accounts its own size

Burak Bayburtlu's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Burak Bayburtlu sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,467 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 2, 202641705x their median

    We heard you. And we agree. In light of recent developments in physical media, GitHub is proud to announce that you can now obtain your public repo on CD-ROM. Keep it. Lend it to friends. Pass it on to your children. Your code is physically yours, forever. Until you lose it, let's be real. Order yours today. https://t.co/z041pdMH7h

    36K3.4K1.3K1.5K5.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264422x their median

    I bought a few domains. We should have Omarchy in every country, every language: https://t.co/puWR79oAdC, https://t.co/hUHKDBD43N, https://t.co/DqkYt6ecrF, https://t.co/yN0hZGkXOd, https://t.co/PjsYrFl7qr, https://t.co/xBS6M3lykP, https://t.co/YKEaFazAXc, https://t.co/aR7IaNA84y, https://t.co/wfoILLRLXn, https://t.co/rHFrMjGGFI, https://t.co/usJEZUzqlZ, https://t.co/zsloAmjJ9g, https://t.co/rxb9x9LHlU, https://t.co/inwxNsZFq0, https://t.co/ihZMbBboVx, https://t.co/RlRBbBeEpj, https://t.co/I62XW3SzOn, https://t.co/CbcxEPkoh5 We are missing a few, but hopefully we can get the kind owners to donate these to the Omacom Foundation 🙏

    3.7K6959860469K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20262498x their median

    Anthropic claims: Alibaba continues to distill Claude on a large scale to train Qwen. Via Bloomberg Anthropic is accusing Alibaba-linked operators of running a massive campaign to illicitly access Claude through nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts. According to Bloomberg, Anthropic claims the campaign generated 28.8 million Claude exchanges between April and June, targeting capabilities like software engineering and agentic reasoning. The company says this is part of a broader pattern of “adversarial distillation,” where Chinese labs allegedly harvest outputs from US frontier models to train rival systems at a fraction of the cost. Lets see how good Qwen 3.8 will be, probably FABLEous good.

    2.0K167226140612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261620x their median

    ‼️ Microsoft's July patch for the RoguePlanet local privilege escalation Defender flaw (CVE-2026-50656) has been bypassed. Nightmare Eclipse published exploit code called ShieldBreak on GitHub, hours after August Patch Tuesday. The researcher claims a 100% success rate on fully patched Windows 11 25H2 and Server 2025, where RoguePlanet's race condition was hit-or-miss. The vulnerability makes it possible for any local user to get SYSTEM. No fix yet.

    1.4K144361761K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20261096x their median

    Thank you @brave for offering Brave Origin to Linux users for free 🙌 https://t.co/32KUdoACuA

    9926433740K viewsView on X
  • Apr 5, 200865x their median

    twitter cilginligi baslasin

  • Jul 17, 202637x their median

    Yapma bunu Claude! Hem 19 Temmuz’da Fable’ı kısıtlıyorsun hem zam yapıyorsun. Zorla ChatGPT’ye mi kaçalım istiyorsun! Rakiplerin açık kaynak kodlu devasa modelleri piyasaya sürerken hem de! https://t.co/1fRYbB9yVE

    19214231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202614x their median

    Tarafını seç #BoycottEdSheeran https://t.co/iPWzNUHmq6

    94013.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202610x their median

    Serhat Kılıç gibi insanlara nefretinizi meşrulaştırmak için ölüsünün ardından evinden görüntü servis eden toplum mühendislerinin maşası olmayı beklemenize gerek yok. Dedeniz de kalleşti siz de kalleşsiniz. Kalleş ve korkak.

    91001.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.0x their median

    Türkiye’de resmi satıcınızdan memnun değilim. Aldığım magsafe araç şarj cihazı havalandırma ızgarama sığmadı, iade ettim ve bana ürünü olduğu gibi geri göndermeye kalktılar. Kendileri uzaktan satışta cayma hakkı diye bir şey duymamış olabilir, öğretirsiniz artık @Havitofficial

    21113.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#boycottedsheeran#dhhiszionist#i̇stanbul#stopomarchy

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 0.096% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.819% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 41705x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #boycottedsheeran, #dhhiszionist, #i̇stanbul.

What is Burak Bayburtlu's engagement rate on X?
Burak Bayburtlu (@burak) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 127,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Burak Bayburtlu sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @burak have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @burak post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going