Back to @bunbounz's profile

USAGI engagement report

@bunbounz - 285K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 285K followers
Per impression
0.92%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
4.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
127
interactions (median)
Saved
0.214%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 127 interactions against 285K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

USAGI's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, USAGI sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link90% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 90% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 144 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 202523x their median

    Are you ready for this? I know you're not but subscribe nway https://t.co/XKrxmV9fIA https://t.co/0bieUvS0HH https://t.co/8DkJFeeCjk

    2.4K42372578K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.5x their median

    A new JFF superfan just used my LIMITED-TIME PROMO: $20.00 for 30 days. Get it while it lasts at: https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/MKjbN2aPfY

    600990059K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20265.2x their median

    He’s one of the few porn stars I actually got off to and having him in the flesh feels unreal. Malasa 🤤 @bunbounz x @SWa2880 Don't miss the good stuff Follow | Subscribe to my JFF https://t.co/LHacPqOirR https://t.co/LHacPqOirR https://t.co/BM1D02Nthm

    5451171012K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20264.8x their median

    Got completely carried away with SWa2880, the hottest Taiwanese porn model I’ve met in person. I lost every bit of control once we started getting wild.... See this and more at: https://t.co/1wzCpEktlD https://t.co/EgFSAmQNsF

    536645022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.8x their median

    A new fan joined today, and I'm glad they're here. There's a lot more waiting on my page: https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/P1ZdLf7oA3

    538670055K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.0x their median

    My https://t.co/eq2EhkmWcy page is where it's at, and I just got a new subscriber! https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/4qrf3f3QkJ

    439730052K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    Someone new just subscribed to my JFF. They're seeing the stuff I only post at https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/zwbyfz8ipQ

    454501057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.9x their median

    A new fan just joined my https://t.co/eq2EhkmWcy page. Check it out at: https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/FFTqAxPq9h

    437532056K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.9x their median

    See more of me on https://t.co/eq2EhkmWcy. Someone else just joined my page! Check it out at: https://t.co/KNdw0y40vV https://t.co/nRqV5EVi1C

    446460057K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.6x their median

    A new fan joined today, and I'm glad they're here. There's a lot more waiting on my page: https://t.co/GcRASrje4t https://t.co/bwIYYvZWfT

    403540032K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 127 interactions against 285K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is USAGI's engagement rate on X?
USAGI (@bunbounz) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 284,660 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, USAGI sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bunbounz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bunbounz post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going