Back to @bullyb170's profile

Belal Muhammad engagement report

@bullyb170 - 915K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.138%
of 915K followers
Per impression
2.29%
55K views on a typical post
Reach
6.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.2/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 915K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 41x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #raf13, #raf14, #rafmoscow.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #raf13, #raf14, #rafmoscow.

Compared with accounts its own size

Belal Muhammad's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.138%, Belal Muhammad sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202641x their median

    I don’t care whether it’s Gaza or Lebanon or Sudan or the Congo. No child in the world deserves this, absolutely disgusting and shameful. https://t.co/LCXuBf1g1u

    36K14K1.1K302394K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202630x their median

    🤲 Islam Makhachev'in paylaşımı: "Nehrinden denizine kadar, Filistin özgür kalacak." https://t.co/hChAYn5kWN

    35K2.2K7925686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202613x their median

    The thing I hate most about this result is knowing people will attack Umar and kick him while he’s down. He’s genuinely one of the quietest, humblest fighters you’ll ever meet. Keep your head up, brother. This sport has the highest highs and the lowest lows. You’ll be back

    14K80456652367K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202612x their median

    Neon was calling for the elbow

    15K2766613434K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20269.6x their median

    A hill I will die on: lots of people suffer from mental health issues bc no one forced them to struggle enough growing up. Struggle builds resilience and is great for you. Life can’t be too easy or every mole hill becomes a mountain.

    11K956345113422K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.5x their median

    John Fetterman just said it: “Until the day I die, I’ll vote to give Israel whatever it needs—military, financial, or intelligence support.” “Israel is a paragon of democracy.” https://t.co/5Vz5lp1rKQ

    2.7K608801187495K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.2x their median

    50-45 is crazy but that was a great fight van vs kape is gonna be all hands

    3.9K6543594K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.0x their median

    Second fight in a row van turns it up in round 5 he’s a dawggg

    3.6K5719051K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20252.3x their median

    Wonder what book illias reading this week

    2.6K6320812279K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    Parnese vs Salkid would be fire

    2.1K57662197K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#raf13#raf14#rafmoscow#ufc331

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 915K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 41x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #raf13, #raf14, #rafmoscow.

What is Belal Muhammad's engagement rate on X?
Belal Muhammad (@bullyb170) has an engagement rate of 0.138%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 914,509 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.138%, Belal Muhammad sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bullyb170 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bullyb170 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going