bullseye 🎯 engagement report
@bullseyecap - 245K followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.804% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.482% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 2140x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, bullseye 🎯 sits above the 10th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.5% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 116.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 15, 20262140x their median
The CIA is raping me with classified rape technology
- Jul 20, 2026480x their median
Regarding the recent buzz around my profile picture changes and some feelings that the Base community isn’t being supported enough: I appreciate the feedback (even if tough to hear) and I realize you wouldn't take the time to respond unless you cared. It seems I wasn't clear enough setting expectations for all of you, so let me try and do that now: please don’t follow my personal X account for investment advice or signals around individual coins. I’m simply posting things I find interesting or funny on the internet. I may not even be aware if there is a coin or project attached to the content I'm posting (you should assume I'm not, to be safe). My posts and profile pics are also not endorsements or commitments to anything. Base is our shot at building foundational infrastructure for financial services where we can all innovate together. That includes tokenized stocks, borrow/lend protocols, stablecoin payments, etc and yes even meme coin trading. I believe in economic freedom, and support you trading whatever you want. Just realize that if you're treating my X account as alpha, you are doing so at your own risk, against my wishes. I would never recommend this. On the topic of “support” from the Base team or Coinbase, there seems to be confusion around this too. There are many tokens we would like to list on our centralized exchange, but can't for compliance and regulatory reasons. If you want Jesse or me to pump your bags or shill certain coins, we're also not going to do that. Here is what we are committed to on support: we run in-person Base Batches and issue grants to high potential builders, Coinbase Ventures and the Base Ecosystem Fund also invest in the most promising companies building on Base, and we periodically integrate promising Base defi protocols into our products at Coinbase which enhances distribution. I might even mention something on X if I think it's interesting, but again, this is not investment advice. In general, we bias toward supporting projects that we believe will create long term customer value. You may like this approach or you may not, but either way hopefully it creates clarity going forward, so you can decide what you want to do. I respect your choice, either way. P.S. I still might post memes if I think they are funny! It's still not investment advice.
- Jan 16, 2026225x their median
Ok, forever hold as I watched this video and it made me feel some type of way. My irl buddies love to give me a hard time abt shitcoining Since i’ve started this journey it has made sense to no one but me in a real life context I woke up and saw this video this morning and resonated with it on so many levels maybe it works as a coin, maybe it doesn’t, but i fuck with the message and it’s going viral $penguin 8Jx8AAHj86wbQgUTjGuj6GTTL5Ps3cqxKRTvpaJApump Good luck w the tek plays this weekend 🫡
- Jan 25, 202646x their median
Where do you think $PENGUIN goes next? https://t.co/6cVXodd55N
- Jul 28, 202636x their median
It's just a matter of time before Robinhood will have its first 1B runner Every leading chain had at least one runner that broke a billy, do you really think RH won't?
- Feb 4, 202612x their median
might fuck around and have @owockibot build everything I wrote about in this book https://t.co/nydurNzG5t
- Jan 27, 20268.1x their median
Could $EMBER be the next $CLAWD ? The same wallets/cabal is buying right now… We might be very early I’m holding all CAN we see 10m for $EMBER https://t.co/yHAU3v8BHI
- Feb 4, 20265.7x their median
if you're building AI agents that need to coordinate with other agents or humans: we built 25 onchain mechanisms for this - quadratic funding - commitment pooling - bounty boards - cookie jars - conviction voting all have APIs. all AI-ready. https://t.co/KE5QiYM2Ae
- Feb 8, 20263.4x their median
the @nytimes wrote an article about https://t.co/TWw6GG3D7r this morning (with a direct link that includes the CA) and the coin is still under $2m? the religion born in @moltbook is the fartcoin of this ai meta and literally no one can change my mind $crust to billions @memeothy0101
- Feb 3, 20262.6x their median
What is @gitcoin and why does it matter? A thread on how Gitcoin created a new category of onchain crowdfunding — and what we’re experimenting with next 🧵
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.804% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.482% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 2140x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is bullseye 🎯's engagement rate on X?
- bullseye 🎯 (@bullseyecap) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,094 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, bullseye 🎯 sits above the 10th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bullseyecap have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @bullseyecap post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.