Back to @bullonmarket's profile

Bull On Market engagement report

@bullonmarket - 313K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 313K followers
Per impression
0.209%
5.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 313K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.209% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 161 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bull On Market's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Bull On Market sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 530 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 202613x their median

    🚨NEWS: Pi Network is exploring stablecoin integration through a potential partnership with Open Standard, the issuer of OUSD. The collaboration could introduce stablecoin payments and Pioneer rewards to the $PI ecosystem, potentially expanding its real-world utility. Pi would remain the network’s native token, while stablecoin functionality could offer additional options for payments and transactions. The development highlights Pi Network’s efforts to broaden its ecosystem and explore new use cases for its community.

    14413229.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202613x their median

    $ROBDOG 在 Robinhood Chain 上正逐渐展现出令人瞩目的潜力。 从 30 万至 36.5 万美元的价格飙升至 50 万美元市值,这一增长表明它正受到越来越多的关注。越来越多的持有者加入,社区也日趋活跃,图表在经历回调后依然保持稳定。 我最欣赏的是围绕这个概念自然而然形成的社区。Robinhood 的故事赋予了 ROBDOG , 个清晰的“归属感”,而狗狗的形象则使其更易于理解和分享。 如果社区能够达成目标,跻身前 100 名,这将进, 步提升其知名度。 目前仍处于早期阶段,仍在发展中,下, 个里程碑也越来越清晰:市值 100 万美元。0xeA0c3C32101aF8C98B8053e5C3aB0ce1692e5A30

    128618215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202612x their median

    $DEALER 是, 个值得关注的项目,因为它并非仅仅追逐最新潮流。 真正引人注目的是项目背后的架构及其生态系统内的联系。与 ANSEM 相关的资金分配、围绕 NORMIE 的开发者活动,以及来自大型钱包的关注,都为这个项目增添了更深层次的意义。@ansemdealer CA: 6f8ZQhxqfigdv7UszZ1rirbV7Sgv83s3rxv1N2Zopump 比起预测每, 个短期走势,我更关注 DEALER 在获得初步关注后的表现。优秀的项目往往能在最初的热潮消退后,依然保持发展势头、社区关注度和重要性。 DEALER、ANSEM 和 NORMIE 之间的联系也赋予了该项目独特的生态系统视角,而不仅仅是, 个孤立的、追随潮流的项目。 对我而言,目前最值得关注的是,随着越来越多的人开始关注,社区和项目故事能否继续发展壮大。

    252495322K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202611x their median

    robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 正在围绕一个简单却极具吸引力的理念构建其 Launchpad(项目启动平台)生态系统:增长并不总是源于与现有平台的竞​​争,有时它源于与这些平台携手合作,并为创作者提供更多进行构建的动力。🔥 @Torchpaddotfun 合约地址 (CA): 0x000050E18ffa3F8F7aD170Eb9CeF160eb3Ed1111 TORCH 并未试图取代那些老牌 Launchpad,而是采取了差异化策略,将自身定位为生态系统中的互补力量。这种定位让平台能够专注于创作者最关心的核心需求:拥有更多选择、触达新受众,以及获得更多通过该平台发布项目的激励因素。 尽管 Launchpad 领域已充斥着各种争夺关注度的平台,但那些能带来独特价值的新模式依然大有可为。TORCH 摒弃了直接竞争,转而主张协作共赢;它致力于构建一种以“拓展创作者机遇”为核心的叙事,从而提升生态系统对寻求发布平台之项目的吸引力。 创作者因此获得了一个展示项目的新渠道,而 TORCH 也有机会吸引更多项目上线、提升生态参与度,并在更广阔的市场中确立更稳固的地位。如果该平台能为创作者提供切实可行的参与理由,这将成为其长期品牌形象的重要基石。 归根结底,一个优秀的 Launchpad 绝不仅仅是部署代币的场所。它需要具备吸引创作者选择的理由、促使社区积极参与的动力,以及一种能激发持续活跃度的运作模式。TORCH 正是围绕这一机遇书写其发展故事——即为现有市场格局增添价值,而非单纯试图取而代之。 robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 正在以独特的视角重塑 Launchpad 的叙事方式,这是一个值得密切关注的项目。

    52176617.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202610x their median

    我在 Robinhood 上建仓了 $ROBDOG 它与 $GME 股票挂钩,而且 Narra 是 FLOKI 的前成员(笑),目前市值仅 30 万美元,价格很便宜。 听说它随时可能一夜之间冲上 100 万美元市值…… 0xeA0c3C32101aF8C98B8053e5C3aB0ce1692e5A30 https://t.co/Nh5z6vlgaq https://t.co/ubVsBZYcQR

    11653110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20269.3x their median

    买入了一些 $LINO——这是在 Robinhood Chain 上推出的、号称下一个 $DOGE 的项目,原型是一只来自日本的哈士奇,其背后的故事既光荣又真实。 @linodogeinu 该 Meme 币与 $TSLA 股票组成交易对,当前市值不到 40 万美元,是极佳的入场时机,且团队背景可靠。 https://t.co/lqn0C7BtTt https://t.co/FGZYObvvNp

    10416113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20269.3x their median

    Robinhood Chain 又多了一只很有意思的猫 🐱 $HMM 给我的感觉很特别。它目前还处在比较早的阶段,但社区已经开始出现持续的讨论和互动,市场关注度也在慢慢升温。对于, 个刚起步的 Meme 来说,这种早期活跃度往往比单纯的一根大阳线更有意思。@thinkingcatRH 更重要的是,HMM 的定位非常简单: Thinking Cat。没有复杂的叙事,反而让社区有足够空间去创造自己的梗、内容和文化。如果后续参与的人越来越多,这只猫能不能从一个小 Meme 逐渐变成 Robinhood Chain 上更有辨识度的角色,就很有意思了。👀 CA: 0x7FE995a80075dF3Dc8Ae11A9b82c7FE4202CD87f

    47655454K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.2x their median

    当前市场高度集中在以猫为主题的 Meme(模因币)上,但叙事热点往往不会永远停留在同一个板块。 从布局角度来看,一个有趣的看点在于:如果资金开始从“猫”类题材轮动到“狗”类题材,会发生什么?当占据主导地位的 Meme 叙事开始失去动能时,流动性往往会寻找下一个具有足够文化号召力、能吸引大众目光的题材。 这正是 $DOW 值得关注的原因所在。@dogonwire 🐶 鲜明的“狗”系 Meme 属性 🐶 布局了可能兴起的“狗”系叙事热潮(Meta) 🐶 抢先布局潜在的叙事轮动行情 🐶 借助与 Robinhood 相关的 Meme 文化,知名度正不断提升 关键不仅仅在于预测“狗”系代币的表现会优于“猫”系;更大的机会在于,在轮动趋势变得人尽皆知之前,就能捕捉到这一转变。 如果“狗”系叙事开始积聚动能,关注度可能会迅速发酵——先是在早期社群中传播,随后扩展到更广泛的散户群体。 市场的驱动力是流动性,而 Meme 的驱动力则是关注度。 如果关注度转向“狗”系题材,$DOW 绝对是一个值得密切关注的标的。👀🐾 保持布局,拿好你的 $DOW。 0x20Aa6E63076EE856F46bb31f7D30E60B335B11E9

    78019116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.1x their median

    $PLUMBER 股票在最初的价格飙升后经历了相当健康的回调,目前市场似乎正在进入休整期。 第, 阶段,买盘强劲,上涨势头迅猛。达到最初的峰值后,卖方开始出现,图表逐渐降温。此后,我们看到几次反弹尝试,但都未能完全恢复最初的涨势。https://t.co/L7LQ6QupIh CA: GCa9TZMK9Q3VUSkhZgX76YAQBjqQd1dPxkBnZojFpump 我发现有趣的是,价格走势变得平静得多。波动性降低,注意力集中,PLUMBER 目前基本上处于“下, 步该怎么做?”的阶段。 对我而言,重要的不是另, 次随机的飙升。我希望看到持续的买盘出现,当前的区间成为, 个稳定的平台。这表明市场正在重建信心,而不是仅仅追逐某, 根K线。 PLUMBER 不需要, 夜暴涨。如果社区保持活跃,兴趣逐渐恢复,那么这个看似平静的阶段最终可能会成为整个过程中最激动人心的部分。

    2094116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20267.4x their median

    从近期的盘面表现来看, $PIZZA 在经历前期的大幅波动后,正在逐渐形成自己的交易节奏。 早期快速上涨之后,价格经历了, 段时间的回调和整理,但近期市场活跃度又开始有所回升。更值得注意的是,价格在低位反复寻找支撑的过程中,多次出现向上尝试。@PizzaBTCB CA: 0x8554D38b95E4F7Ca11D391008627Df30B2b07777 虽然每次拉升都会伴随, 定的获利回吐,但买盘依然能够重新承接住价格,没有让走势彻底转弱。这种反复吸收抛压的表现,让当前的整理阶段多了, 些观察价值。https://t.co/7mdpV8i5zb 接下来,如果 PIZZA 能够继续稳住当前区域,同时保持足够的交易活跃度,市场情绪或许会进, 步改善。相比单纯关注短期涨跌,现在更值得留意的是这段震荡能否逐渐形成新的支撑,并为后续方向选择提供基础。

    8081013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 313K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.209% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 161 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Bull On Market's engagement rate on X?
Bull On Market (@bullonmarket) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 313,145 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Bull On Market sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bullonmarket have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bullonmarket post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going