Back to @bsarwary's profile

BILAL SARWARY engagement report

@bsarwary - 255K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 255K followers
Per impression
1.03%
9.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
101
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BILAL SARWARY's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, BILAL SARWARY sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video51% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 51% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1030 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 11, 201744x their median

    #AFG Nothing can better epitomize the tragedy & misery of war than this picture. A village graveyard home to young men lost on both sides. https://t.co/yFU5CAaeoJ

    3.4K63727372View on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.3x their median

    Eleven professors from the Faculty of Medicine at Herat University have collectively resigned, citing “humiliating” treatment by Taliban morality officials and the detention of academics over the length of their beards. The faculty has around 22 professors, meaning this single resignation could remove half of its teaching staff. This is a medical faculty in a country that desperately needs doctors and skilled professionals. Afghanistan already has 2.2 million girls excluded from education beyond Grade 6, while women remain barred from universities. Now experienced male academics are also walking away over interference in how they dress, pray and wear their beards. When a university loses half the teachers of a medical faculty over beard length, it says something deeply troubling about the direction of education in Afghanistan.

    22779111236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.2x their median

    Afghanistan’s Armed Resistance Is No Longer Just an Exile Story The death of Haseeb Qaway Markaz carries significance beyond just his individual story. A controversial figure, he faced allegations of serious crimes, which should have led to arrest, due process, and trial. His path from Afghanistan’s volatile political and social spheres to becoming an armed opponent of the Taliban indicates a broader shift since 2021. For years, Taliban officials have dismissed much of the resistance as either social-media theatrics or exile politics. However, reports of Haseeb’s presence within Afghanistan, along with renewed clashes in Badakhshan, Takhar, Kunduz and targeted attacks in Herat and Ghor, challenge that narrative. He reportedly maintained networks in Panjshir and Baghlan and worked closely with former special forces personnel. His death strikes a blow to those networks and the larger resistance camp led by Ahmad Massoud. This does not mean the Taliban are facing an existential military threat. The opposition remains fragmented, and its strength is limited compared to the state. Yet, it is now increasingly clear: organized armed resistance exists within Afghanistan, is operational, and is becoming more visible.

    2783111227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.1x their median

    ننګرهار؛ اچین کې د ۲۵ طالبانو سرونه پرې شوي د ننګرهار د اچین ولسوالۍ د مامند سیمې څخه راته يوې طالب سرچينې وويل چې د داعش ـ خراسان ډلې وسله‌والو د طالبانو پر یوه ډله برید کړی او شاوخوا ۲۵ طالبان یې وژلي دي. د راپورونو له مخې، په دې پېښه کې د وژل شویو کسانو سرونه هم غوڅ شوي دي. اچین د ننګرهار د شينوارو هغه ولسوالي ده چې په تېرو کلونو کې د داعش ـ خراسان او طالبانو ترمنځ د سختو نښتو له مهمو سیمو څخه پاتې شوی دی.

    21135511564K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.2x their median

    طالبان دیگر به این نکته پی برده اند که جمعه‌خان اگر کشته نشود، یک درد سر دایمی در بدخشان خواهد بود. بدخشانی که معادنش مورد علاقه شرکای طالبان قرار داد، یک سوی مرزش به خاطر دخالت و قاچاق در آسیای میانه مهم است، و سوی دیگر مرزش به چین و پاکستان ارزش داشته و می‌تواند در ثبات و بی‌ثباتی نظام طالبان نقش داشته باشد. از همین سبب نیرو های بیشتر طالبان از مناطق مختلف بدخشان و محلاتی در شمال به سوی ولسوالی های نسی و شکی، اعزام شده اند. با آن که از آخرین پیام جمعه‌خان به قاری فصیح‌الدین بوی تسلیمی‌ می‌آید اما جمعه‌خان شاید بداند که حکم قتل او چه در صورت تسلیمی و چه در صورت جنگ صادر شده است. طالبی که ۷ معدنچی را فقط به خاطر بدخشانی بودن به قتل می‌رساند بر جمعه‌خان رحم خواهد کرد؟

    189199231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.0x their median

    در منطقه مامند، ولسوالی اچین در شینوار ننگرهار، ۲۵ طالب در سالگرد سقوط کابل به دست آنان، توسط افراد موسوم به داعش کشته شده و سر های شان را نیز از تن جدا کرده‌اند. این منطقه از مدت‌ها پیش ساحه کشمکش میان گروه‌های متخاصم مسلح بوده است. برخورد وحشت‌آمیز با اجساد عمق دشمنی میان دو گروه را نشان می‌دهد.

    1652113216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    From Suicide Bomber to General Sirajuddin Haqqani recently recounted an almost comic story about a Taliban fighter named Hayatullah Ghaznavi. During the insurgency, Ghaznavi apparently sought permission to carry out a suicide attack. Today, he approaches Haqqani asking for the rank of general. Yesterday, the ambition was to die wearing an explosive vest. Today, it is to wear stars on the shoulder, hold an office, travel in a government vehicle, and carry the title of general. The joke, however, is only on those who survived. For ordinary Afghans, the Taliban’s twenty-year insurgency was not a humorous journey from the mountains to government offices. It was funerals, amputations, destroyed homes, orphaned children, shattered marketplaces, and families waiting outside hospitals to learn whether loved ones were alive. Haqqani himself has spoken proudly of the role of suicide bombers. Haqqani Network’s Badri Brigade had trained 1,050 suicide attackers and became infamous for such suicide bombings and complex attacks. The human toll was immense. By 2019, UNAMA had documented over 100,000 civilian deaths and injuries in Afghanistan since systematic recording began in 2009. That year alone, 3,403 civilians were killed and 6,989 wounded. These casualties came from all sides of the conflict, but suicide attacks and improvised explosives became some of its most terrifying signatures. This is what makes Ghaznavi’s request so revealing. The men who were once prepared to martyr themselves survived long enough to inherit the state. The policemen they fought are dead, displaced, or unemployed. Soldiers who defended provincial capitals now drive taxis abroad. Civil servants have lost their careers. Widows continue to raise children without fathers. And the former suicide-bomber candidate? He would like to be a general. Perhaps this is the darkest summary of Afghanistan’s last twenty five years: those who were asked to die became officials; those caught between them and the state were left with the graves. The insurgency promised paradise to its fighters. Victory, it seems, came with ministries, ranks, convoys, and promotions. For countless ordinary Afghans, the end of the war meant no advancement, only suffering and hardship.

    120246323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.5x their median

    I spoke to @bbclysedoucet on @BBCNewshour https://t.co/JwngqMaUIj

    14048010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    طالبان و منابع مربوط به جبهه مقاومت کشته شدن حسیب پنجشیری، معروف به حسیب قوای مرکز، از فرماندهان این جبهه را تایید کرده؛ اما طلوع‌نیوز در خبرش در فیسبوک، موضع تندتر گرفته و "جبهه شر و فساد" نوشته است. https://t.co/aFKBtSNZWn

    101936220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    ۵۲ زخمی و اکثر شان هم دخترها و پسران خوردسن در شهرک مهدیه ناحیه ۱۸ دشت برچی کابل، یک رقم بزرگ و تکاندهنده است. چرا طالبان برای چنین مناطق، استراتیژی مشخص امنیتی ندارند؟ آیا طرفدار ناامن شدن و کوچ اجباری آنان هستند؟ اگر چنین‌ نیست، پس چرا به چندمین بار مردم محل هدف حمله قرار می‌گیرند و راه حلی سنجیده نمی‌شود؟ مسئول فعلی امنیت مردم کیست؟ از سوی دیگر، رسانه های کابل چه می‌کنند؟ دفاتر شان از دشت برچی و شفاخانه ایمرجنسی چقدر فاصله دارد؟ چرا اخبار تایید نشده نشر می‌کنند؟ چرا چشمدید و گزارش تحقیقی ندارند؟ اجازه ندارند یا ظرفیت؟ یکی خبر انفجار سرگلوله سابق را پخش می‌کند، دیگر پرتاب بمب دستی را دلیل می‌داند، و دیگرش از حمله با موترسایکل گزارش می‌دهد. اما هیچ کدام از دفتر خود بیرون نمی رود تا گزارش دقیق به دست بیاورد. منتطر هستند که سخنگویان و منابع امنیتی چیزی بگویند و اینان تکرار کنند.

    11424828.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is BILAL SARWARY's engagement rate on X?
BILAL SARWARY (@bsarwary) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 254,880 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, BILAL SARWARY sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bsarwary have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bsarwary post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going