Back to @brycent's profile

Brycent engagement report

@brycent - 220K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 220K followers
Per impression
1.07%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
5.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.178%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.67/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 734x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brycent's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, Brycent sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 2026734x their median

    is this the state of streaming in 2026 https://t.co/EDUYygMtlO

    85K1.8K6204376.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20269.2x their median

    We started YC 12 weeks ago at ~$15K MRR. Today, just before Demo Day, Tsenta crossed $250K MRR — $3M annualized. Here’s the playbook we used to grow a consumer startup this quickly 🧵

    992326816160K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20268.5x their median

    i confirmed instinct was AGI by having it figure out how to get me out of jury duty https://t.co/ZRuVbOvhZq

    96083315238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20268.0x their median

    I don't think people realize how many are falling into psychosis by doom scrolling down rabbit holes on tiktok. Once you watch one type of video your entire feed pushes the same narrative.

    751159212664K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20267.3x their median

    The news has finally broke that @Shopify has acquired the https://t.co/gjqy7hcJft domain name! I learned about this deal several months ago at a very interesting cocktail party. While I was not involved in the transaction, and because nobody directly involved is my source, I am going to tell you something that is not being reported: The price was $100 Million!!! JUST the domain name. That is the state of the market ladies and gentlemen. YOUR DOMAIN = YOUR BRAND = THE LAST MOAT

    621949073270K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.2x their median

    Reintroducing friend. https://t.co/jT89Ju6nAw

    284105144148K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    Someone should build a Manychat alternative You could make an absurd amount of money and just come in slightly cheaper and I would be your first customer Their pricing is absurd.

    234393735K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    Was a peptide skeptic for a while. Decided to try them, and can confirm I am very happy with the results thus far. Life changing stuff

    128153222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.5x their median

    What if movies were not viewed but experienced? What if you could star in your own movie? What if you could change the ending? https://t.co/SJMAPRkf3t - Choose your genre - Cast yourself and your friends - Change the storyline Create your own adventure. All in 15 minutes. Introducing Koyal Experiences. Generate for free now at https://t.co/SJMAPRkf3t

    12117311239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    After testing Muse, Polk, and Instinct, I must say it is actually insane how fast @Muse is in comparison. It feels lightning quick, and I think the selling point for me is the personal AI assistant feels better and more organized in an application, versus it being an iMessage group where it gets cluttered with other things. Every AI assistant agent should pivot to having its own native iPhone app. 10/10 experience.

    140229516K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 734x its own typical post.

What is Brycent's engagement rate on X?
Brycent (@brycent) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 220,020 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, Brycent sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brycent have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @brycent post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going