Back to @brunovicari's profile

Bruno Vicari engagement report

@brunovicari - 259K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.036%
of 259K followers
Per impression
1.12%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 259K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 339x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #futebolnaespn.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Bruno Vicari sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 26, 2026339x their median

    Matéria do New York Times com DADOS FÍSICOS e curiosidades do Pelé em 1975: • Quando estava treinando, o coração de Pelé batia cerca de 56 a 58 vezes por minuto. Um atleta médio na época batia cerca de 90 a 95 vezes. • A capacidade aeróbica do Pelé era tanta, que ele conseguia repetir um “grande esforço” em menos de UM MINUTO. • Sua visão periférica era 30% maior que a de um atleta médio. • Pés paralelos e ossos do calcanhar extremamente fortes e desenvolvidos. • Pelé teve aulas de GEOMETRIA e aprendeu a jogar xadrez para aperfeiçoar seu jogo. Ele jogava futebol como se fosse uma partida de xadrez. • Pelé corria 100 metros em 11 segundos. • Pelé saltava cerca de 1,83m. Ele pulava mais cedo que os adversários pra cabecear a bola e tinha a capacidade de “pairar” no ar. Algumas frases da matéria; “Leonardo da Vinci uma vez esboçou um homem com os braços esticados em um círculo para mostrar as proporções perfeitas do corpo do homem. Pelé parece se encaixar no molde.” “Há alguns anos, especialistas médicos examinaram a figura esbelta e atlética de Pelé por semanas em um laboratório universitário. Eles o cutucaram, mediram seus músculos e sua mente e, quando terminaram, disseram: “O que quer que este homem pudesse ter decidido fazer em qualquer empreendimento físico ou mental, ele teria sido um gênio.” Sem comparações, por favor. 🐐🇧🇷

    28K3.0K307277920K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 202612x their median

    Amigos, essa é minha última semana na ESPN. Por isso, estou à procura de freelas para os próximos três meses. Caso saibam de algo, me avisem! Tenho experiência em mkt e redes sociais, assessoria de imprensa, coordenação de transmissões e produção operacional. Obrigada 🙏

    9481032210163K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202610x their median

    Messi NUNCA será Pelé. 👑 Meu argumento na discussão na @ESPNBrasil https://t.co/TrvSoYnQGL

    744113961219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.6x their median

    Qual nome fez a história do Palmeiras? Em 112, muitos fizeram… e o Teu Nome ainda faz história! @SportingbetBR https://t.co/9P7m6ZlTVr

    74942217.1K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20267.4x their median

    🚨Exclusiva de hoje no “Fala a Fonte”: Barboza faz exames hoje, pra depois assinar com o Palmeiras @ESPNBrasil @f_delaurentiis https://t.co/4cf8ZRp7eX

    6283912227K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.8x their median

    Palmeiras perto de negociar Luighi com a MLS C/ Bruno Andrade e @andrehernan | @ESPNBrasil https://t.co/AyROFKhc4Y

    3181215914K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20263.3x their median

    Partindo pra mais uma! Faremos o melhor por vcs, fãs de esportes! @ESPNBrasil @SportsCenterBR @DisneyPlusBR https://t.co/xssVJAUUjU

    29737011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.2x their median

    Mais um tijolinho rumo à Maratona de Amsterdam! 🇳🇱 7 semanas pra evoluir até lá 🏃 https://t.co/0pvp4dnbQc

    2890908.1K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20262.6x their median

    Carlos Miguel é a novidade na seleção Bola de Prata após atualização da 15ª rodada! Puma, Thiago Mendes e Arrascaeta voltam ao time. @espnbrasil https://t.co/YJBx39Jm4e

    22211219.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 2026

    Bastidor do “nosso centro de imprensa” em Morristown . @danilolavieri @fredcaldeira https://t.co/peLtIHFOPu

    12932116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#futebolnaespn

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 259K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 339x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Bruno Vicari's engagement rate on X?
Bruno Vicari (@brunovicari) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 259,432 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Bruno Vicari sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brunovicari have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @brunovicari post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going