Back to @brunoog97's profile

Bruno Guimarães engagement report

@brunoog97 - 335K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
7.94%
of 335K followers
Per impression
11.2%
237K views on a typical post
Reach
70.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
27K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
125 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 27K interactions against 335K followers, an engagement rate of 7.94%. Posts are seen about 237K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 70.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 7.94%, Bruno Guimarães sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 52 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 31, 20223.4x their median

    Enquanto existir o futebol vai existir você, Pelé. Você foi e sempre será o melhor. Você é eterno! Obrigado por tanto 👑 https://t.co/Tda6tPpsDi

    87K4.2K4522294.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20253.4x their median

    O Futebol Clube do Porto está de luto. É com choque e profundo pesar que enviamos as sentidas condolências à família e amigos do Diogo Jota e irmão André Silva, que também foi nosso atleta nos escalões de formação. Descansem em paz. #FCPorto https://t.co/BXlR8v7y7Z

    79K10K6287008.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.2x their median

    Very happy to have played my first minutes in this shirt and at this stadium! Very excited about everything we have ahead of us. Thank you for the support, and see you Sunday, Gunners! 🔴⚪3️⃣9️⃣ @Arsenal https://t.co/BG9Ori0ZxS

    53K5.0K700139722K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20251.7x their median

    Mixed feelings. We will never give up under any circumstances. We deserved more, but many times football is not fair. We stick together. There is still a lot ahead, and your support will always be fundamental. Howay the lads.3️⃣9️⃣🖤🤍 https://t.co/27vtsNahIr

    40K1.8K2.1K4581.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    🧊⚔️ @adidasfootball @Arsenal https://t.co/mKko15wvGw

    24K2.0K14038237K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2025

    🇧🇷❤️ https://t.co/CjWSjqENIE

    18K33833135282K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 2026

    Primeiro dia em busca de um sonho 🇧🇷❤️‍🔥🙏🏽 https://t.co/s3tJBpweRR

    16K32231464497K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2025

    🇸🇬✈️🖤🤍 https://t.co/y7lfQrpUbl

    15K32419452377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2025

    Three very important points. Now it’s time to rest a bit for our Champions League debut. Howay the lads! 🖤🤍3️⃣9️⃣ https://t.co/IOKKbBMvXM

    15K45114915391K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2025

    Back on it tomorrow! Howay the lads 🖤🤍 https://t.co/qbDCSWTsFR

    12K43731331209K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 27K interactions against 335K followers, an engagement rate of 7.94%. Posts are seen about 237K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 70.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Bruno Guimarães's engagement rate on X?
Bruno Guimarães (@brunoog97) has an engagement rate of 7.94%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 335,344 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 7.94%, Bruno Guimarães sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brunoog97 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @brunoog97 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going