Back to @brianstelter's profile

Brian Stelter engagement report

@brianstelter - 986K followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 986K followers
Per impression
0.457%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
2.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
111
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.03/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 111 interactions against 986K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.457% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #paramount, #exclusive.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #paramount, #exclusive.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Stelter's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Brian Stelter sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202679x their median

    Meet Natalie Harp, the aide so close to Trump she once rode in an SUV trunk to accompany him “As the motorcade idled outside his Trump Tower residence, staffers confronted a more immediate problem: There wasn’t room for Harp, the hyper-loyal aide whose devotion to Trump had quickly entrenched her within his orbit. A screaming match in the lobby ensued, with Harp insisting that Trump had personally asked her to attend the court appearance, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. Denied a seat but determined not to be left behind, Harp jumped into an SUV trunk, according to the two sources and confirmed by a photo obtained by CNN.” W @adamcancryn https://t.co/ZKgB46OPUe

    5.4K1.4K1.7K3331.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202645x their median

    An update from Sean Parnell, Chairman of the Afghanistan Withdrawal Special Review Panel, on the Fifth Anniversary of the Abbey Gate bombing https://t.co/5pkbmuuyX0

    3.6K1.1K224104518K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202627x their median

    "After an 18-year career at Fox News, Jennifer Hegseth is now her husband’s most influential adviser and de facto producer, shaping the job like no Pentagon spouse has before" "It's bonkers," says an ex-Pentagon spox under Hegseth https://t.co/2jFDbQW8y4

    2.0K80413551248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202624x their median

    The Justice Department was preparing to wage a legal battle more than a decade in the making against the world’s largest concert promoter. Then Trump called. Inside the leadup to the Live Nation settlement, where many DOJ officials regarded the political interference as extreme even for an administration in which the White House regularly inserts itself into law-enforcement matters. W/the stellar team @joe_palazzolo @DanaMattioli @jdawsey1 @davidamichaels: https://t.co/8ooETdL0PS

    1.9K6802755551K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202620x their median

    Jon Ossoff knew exactly what he was doing by invoking President Trump’s “travel with Natalie” the other day. Google searches for Trump’s executive assistant Natalie Harp spiked by 5,000%. News outlets hurried to meet the demand for info... https://t.co/Hzr8iMqF0q

    1.7K21228532110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202615x their median

    Disney's lawsuit this morning is one of the stiffest challenges from any media company against the Trump administration. https://t.co/9nVWYQ9U54

    1.3K296441878K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202613x their median

    Reuters: DISNEY AND ITS ABC UNIT SUE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION SEEKING COURT ORDER TO END EARLY LICENSE RENEWAL PROCEEDING

    1.2K193136122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202612x their median

    SCOOP: Trump to appear on podcast hosted by Michael Cohen, his former fixer and onetime foe The interview is scheduled to air Thursday on Cohen’s podcast, according to a White House official granted anonymity to describe plans that have not been publicly announced. The interview marks an extraordinary thaw in the relationship between the two men, whose rupture played out across court filings, congressional testimony and a tell-all book. w/ @VaughnHillyard https://t.co/YFeB1wGxsc

    799237187131935K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20267.9x their median

    Think back to April, when Trump demanded ABC fire Jimmy Kimmel. ABC ignored him. The FCC challenged ABC's licenses. And now we're here... https://t.co/U99XinzXVo

    67118523231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.5x their median

    Seconding what @EWagmeister said on CNN just now: "It kind of felt like she would live forever, didn't it? Because even though we knew her age and we knew her health struggles, it just felt like Dolly Parton would be with all of us forever."

    7407212324K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#paramount#exclusive

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 111 interactions against 986K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.457% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #paramount, #exclusive.

What is Brian Stelter's engagement rate on X?
Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 986,177 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Brian Stelter sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brianstelter have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @brianstelter post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going