Back to @brenzambranoc's profile

Brenda Zambrano πŸ’ engagement report

@brenzambranoc - 932K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.519%
of 932K followers
Per impression
6.49%
74K views on a typical post
Reach
8.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.481%
358 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 932K followers, an engagement rate of 0.519%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 6.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brenda Zambrano πŸ’'s engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.519%, Brenda Zambrano πŸ’ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.438% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 5, 20264.7x their median

    Vamos MΓ©xico πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ https://t.co/as0WaAg93r

    22K4511475333K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    cierra tu puerta y mira los comentarios https://t.co/GyZXbFMTm2

    14K205940662K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.5x their median

    Rayito del sol β˜€οΈ https://t.co/b1Fj6pEUeK

    12K184962185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.4x their median

    TΓΊ me debes un beso πŸ’‹ https://t.co/ghCc3eo49t

    11K2361732187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    Dime algo rico https://t.co/pznlD4HX9R

    9.4K16935710104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.0x their median

    πŸ¦€πŸ§š https://t.co/nRkVFbWl5u

    9.3K1901230121K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20261.7x their median

    DescrΓ­beme en 1 palabra https://t.co/Iew1qCOhS4

    7.6K1525259134K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20261.6x their median

    Por acΓ‘ hace mucho calor πŸ₯΅ https://t.co/bhfpUebf4Y

    7.6K160554217K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20261.6x their median

    Dime algo muy rico https://t.co/MIOrSD8M0D

    7.3K1632597113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20261.5x their median

    Necesito un mejor amigo para mandarle estos videos cuando se me antojeπŸ‘€ https://t.co/W4nk3nrJAY

    7.0K1741550135K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 932K followers, an engagement rate of 0.519%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 6.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

What is Brenda Zambrano πŸ’'s engagement rate on X?
Brenda Zambrano πŸ’ (@brenzambranoc) has an engagement rate of 0.519%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 931,925 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.519%, Brenda Zambrano πŸ’ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brenzambranoc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @brenzambranoc post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going