Brent N. Hunter engagement report
@brentnhunter - 273K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 409 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brent N. Hunter's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Brent N. Hunter sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 97% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 305 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 3, 2026
Every sold-out show this summer led to more dates, more collaborations, more music. That's not just good business; it's a truth about how life works. There's always more to discover, create, and understand. What's one area where you're ready to loo... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/jvA5g3MKXa
- Sep 2, 2026
Scientists didn't ask IF a pancreatic cancer treatment could exist. They asked how and when. In August 2026, the FDA approved daraxonrasib, the first of its kind. That's the power of conviction over doubt. Where are you still asking "if" when you c... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/z8hsUPbPGW
- Jul 20, 2026
Accepting that life can be hard doesn't make you a pessimist. It actually makes the hard parts easier to carry. When we stop being shocked by difficulty, we find we're more ready to move through it. What's your experience with that shift? Reply below. https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/kQ4nSlEAse
- Aug 17, 2026
Tech layoffs in 2026 have already surpassed last year's total. For anyone facing that uncertainty right now, one principle offers real steadiness: life can have challenges. Accepting that truth doesn't make it easy, but it does make it navigable. W... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/r6jzRmHj7I
- Jul 25, 2026
Some physicists propose that dark matter could be linked to a hidden 'mirror world,' remaining unseen yet influencing the universe through gravity. That's The Darkness as a principle: what we can't see is still consequential. Hard seasons shape us... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/WML3KXiodF
- Jul 15, 2026
Kindness isn't just a nice quality. It's a practice that reshapes every relationship we're in. When we can't be constructive in a situation, stepping back is itself an act of respect. That's the Path of Heart at work. What's one way you've seen thi... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/UCYL3nYhdA
- Jul 14, 2026
A community divided by long-held assumptions is a lot like a dreamer who doesn't know they're dreaming. The principle Life is a Dream reminds us we can become lucid inside the story and choose differently. What narrative are you ready to question?... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/0Ub0BIjEyw
- Aug 22, 2026
When Canada’s search and rescue volunteers step into difficult terrain to find a stranger, something shifts in them. The worry about their own lives quiets. That's what being of service does. It's one of the fastest paths to purpose. What's your ex... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/3mrkFMYHN2
- Aug 21, 2026
The 2026 solar eclipse didn't wait for anyone who wasn't ready. It crossed the sky in a precise sequence, on its own schedule. Timing and Sequence work the same way in our lives: right action at the wrong moment, or in the wrong order, still misses... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/5LA2LpzDEg
- Aug 18, 2026
Australia's new social media age rules remind us that even well-meaning access can tip out of balance without boundaries. Balance and Moderation isn't about doing less; it's about seeing clearly. What's a blind spot you've been meaning to examine?... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/mCWKGyaI0A
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 409 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.
- What is Brent N. Hunter's engagement rate on X?
- Brent N. Hunter (@brentnhunter) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,522 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Brent N. Hunter sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @brentnhunter have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @brentnhunter post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.