Brent N. Hunter engagement report
@brentnhunter - 272K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 380 times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brent N. Hunter's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, Brent N. Hunter sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 97% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 97% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 97% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 302 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 3, 20265.0x their median
Every sold-out show this summer led to more dates, more collaborations, more music. That's not just good business; it's a truth about how life works. There's always more to discover, create, and understand. What's one area where you're ready to loo... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/jvA5g3MKXa
- Sep 10, 20264.0x their median
A new study of 3,700+ dream reports found that what we focus on in waking life shapes what shows up in our dreams. Life is a Dream says the same is true in reverse. A growing body of research suggests that the themes we repeatedly imagine or dwell... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/LOvNrTQFoT
- Jul 20, 20264.0x their median
Accepting that life can be hard doesn't make you a pessimist. It actually makes the hard parts easier to carry. When we stop being shocked by difficulty, we find we're more ready to move through it. What's your experience with that shift? Reply below. https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/kQ4nSlEAse
- Sep 19, 20263.0x their median
The UN's SDG Moment this week is framed around accelerating what works, not cataloguing what's broken. That's Focus on What You Want in action at global scale. It's a reminder that where attention goes, results follow. What are you directing yours... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/K3Bs4MgMo7
- Sep 13, 20263.0x their median
In Aug 2026, a single cybersecurity incident at Boston Scientific rippled across its entire global operation. That's Endless Connections in plain sight. We're never as separate from one another as we think. How have you seen this play out in your o... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/sZGcI9kak6
- Sep 12, 20263.0x their median
When markets shifted in late August and early September 2026 from treating a Fed rate hike as unlikely to pricing it as more likely than not, every plan built on the old assumption had to move fast. That's not an anomaly; that's the deal. Change is... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/wNKZMLa8JS
- Sep 11, 20263.0x their median
When rules shift and plans get disrupted, trust isn't about pretending it's fine. It's about staying focused on what you're building toward. In 2026, Australian families using discretionary trusts began reassessing their structures in response to p... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/NRUbb8g08O
- Sep 9, 20263.0x their median
A 30-second breath test for cancer detection is now in trials. Science keeps reminding us: breath isn't just survival, it's information, it's power, it's a reset. When did you last stop and really breathe? What shifted? Share below. https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/b6QZ2bJxcP
- Jul 25, 20263.0x their median
Some physicists propose that dark matter could be linked to a hidden 'mirror world,' remaining unseen yet influencing the universe through gravity. That's The Darkness as a principle: what we can't see is still consequential. Hard seasons shape us... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/WML3KXiodF
- Jul 15, 20263.0x their median
Kindness isn't just a nice quality. It's a practice that reshapes every relationship we're in. When we can't be constructive in a situation, stepping back is itself an act of respect. That's the Path of Heart at work. What's one way you've seen thi... https://t.co/zkMA5zDRBZ https://t.co/UCYL3nYhdA
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 380 times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
- What is Brent N. Hunter's engagement rate on X?
- Brent N. Hunter (@brentnhunter) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 271,991 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, Brent N. Hunter sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @brentnhunter have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @brentnhunter post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.