Back to @breakfastclubam's profile

The Breakfast Club engagement report

@breakfastclubam - 607K followers on X

Measured over 107 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 607K followers
Per impression
0.373%
6.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.062%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.57/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 607K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 107 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.373% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 107 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 443x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #michaelthebull, #thebullnyc.

Measured over 107 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #michaelthebull, #thebullnyc.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Breakfast Club's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, The Breakfast Club sits above the 10th percentile of the 197,623 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.663%
p902.52%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 197,623 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.663%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026443x their median

    On the @JoeBuddenPod, Fat Joe defended his use of the N-word, pointing to his heritage and proximity to Blackness. Marc Lamont Hill wasn’t in the room for the conversation, but later responded to Fat Joe’s comments via social media. Tap in to the latest with @LorenLorosa. https://t.co/si8NU8zKWZ

    8.7K6511.1K173313K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026186x their median

    🚨 Donkey Of The Day goes to BMF actor Da’Vinchi for comments he made regarding his thoughts on U.S. slavery, claiming, “It’s time to move on…” @cthagod breaks it down in 🫏 DOTD, powered by @msllegal. 🐂 #MichaelTheBull #TheBullNYC https://t.co/loPiU9pEEN

    3.5K713195107169K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026179x their median

    🚨 Yesterday, Yung Miami dropped a trailer announcing her new solo album, Watch Dis, and you know we got the exclusive! 😉 Tap into the latest w/ @LorenLorosa https://t.co/VHbtpipUKi

    3.8K2582054457K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026176x their median

    🚨 @E40 stopped by to promote his new quadruple album, ‘Turning My Money Over,’ dropping August 28! 🎶💰 E-40 reflects on the career-changing decision to go from being independent to signing with Lil Jon and how that move changed the trajectory of his career. 👀 Tap in to the full conversation on @Netflix! 📺🔥

    3.8K344513355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026165x their median

    🚨 Yung Miami dropped the “Spend Dat” remix 👀but which version is hitting harder? The Breakfast Club weighs in on BOTH remixes! 🎶💥 Tap into the latest w/ @lorenlorosa ! https://t.co/xTn2Sa33fv

    3.4K22025158148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026114x their median

    🚨 @AbdulElSayed started as physician and opens up about why he decided to enter the race in Michigan and why he believes the Democratic Party needs to get back to fighting for the people. 🇺🇸 He also reflects on what he sees was the turning point for the party, arguing that corporate influence and campaign funding have shifted its priorities. 🗣️“I don’t want your solidarity when it’s easy.” Tap into the full interview on @Netflix. 🎥 .

    2.3K352483048K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202689x their median

    🚨 Druski sets the record straight! In a new interview with GQ, Druski opens up about navigating the entertainment industry, addresses rumors that he took sides in the Kendrick Lamar vs. Drake beef, and explains how his interaction with Kendrick during his livestream was taken out of context. 👀 Tap in to the latest w/ @lorenlorosa

    1.9K10272443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202687x their median

    🚨 @fatjoe did NOT want to revisit the time he and @cthagod nearly came to blows in the bathroom! 😳🥊 Joe breaks down what sparked the heated altercation and how things almost went left between the two. 👀 Tap in to hear the full conversation on @netflix 🔥 https://t.co/h0i6yuk0Xw

    1.9K15231572K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202671x their median

    🚨 IT’S FREAKY FREAKY FRIDAY! You know The Breakfast Club is a safe space... kinda ☺️. A man went viral for his micro-🍆 issue, and we were curious to know how many other men were dealing with the same issue! 👀 Listen live every Monday–Friday from 6 AM–10 AM on @iHeartRadio! 📻 https://t.co/l30YnoUzwn

    1.5K113851248K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202668x their median

    🚨 Family, forgiveness, and second chances take center stage in new film Misty Green out on 10/9. @chrisrock opens up about where things currently stand with his brother, Tony Rock, following Tony’s recent comments about wanting to hit the road for a comedy tour with him. Watch the full conversation now on @Netflix and listen on the FREE @iHeartRadio app! 🎙️

    1.3K1341014950K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#michaelthebull#thebullnyc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 607K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 107 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.373% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 107 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 443x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #michaelthebull, #thebullnyc.

What is The Breakfast Club's engagement rate on X?
The Breakfast Club (@breakfastclubam) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 107 original posts from the last 30 days against 607,358 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, The Breakfast Club sits above the 10th percentile of the 197,623 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @breakfastclubam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @breakfastclubam post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going