Back to @bravosresearch's profile

Bravos Research engagement report

@bravosresearch - 298K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.05%
of 298K followers
Per impression
0.492%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
10.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
150
interactions (median)
Saved
0.133%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.492% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 721 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Bravos Research sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 237 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 20264.8x their median

    Gold now makes up a record 171% of total money supply The last 2 times this line crossed the 120% threshold were in the 1930s & 1970s Both of them ended in a MAJOR Monetary Reset A thread 🧵 https://t.co/O3vHmEePrX

    574107231775K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20262.5x their median

    Oil, Gold, Silver, Bitcoin, and stocks have all fallen together in recent weeks. Most investors fear a recession. But history suggests there may be a much bigger force at play right now…. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/isDobp6NBX

    2434483479K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.4x their median

    Global central banks are rapidly accumulating gold. At the same time, they are aggressively selling their US Treasuries. If this trend continues, it will have MAJOR implications for the US Financial System. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/IFM9w04lFM

    301507645K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.6x their median

    Foreign central banks have been dumping their US Treasuries at a record pace. They have already sold $500 billion worth of Treasuries in just the past 5 years. This won’t end well… A thread 🧵 https://t.co/7xuyzJk3Hm

    1552353651K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    The Mag 7 stocks that have driven the recent bull market are starting to crack. These stocks account for nearly 40% of the US stock. And they are already down by 20% relative to the S&P 500. This won’t end well… A thread 🧵 https://t.co/iZKfMPAOoA

    1612419450K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    The US and Japan are intervening together to prevent the Japanese yen from declining further. A stronger yen has historically been a major headwind for the US equity market. This has the potential to completely reshape the financial markets. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/mKsb0ZRwDe

    148138226K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Americans are becoming increasingly bullish on stocks. Yet they're growing more pessimistic about their own financial situation. We’ve NEVER seen this before. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/r0jY6Juo3p

    1151811844K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Cash on the sidelines has just surpassed $8 TRILLION. Such sharp rises have only occurred before major recessions: 2000, 2008, & 2020. Is History about to Repeat? A thread 🧵 https://t.co/wFbp8fV16o

    872314433K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    The companies building the AI infrastructure have surged by 300% since April 2025 But the companies spending all the money on AI have been showing signs of weakness One of them is lying… A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/f8rPGVIOCo

    100205228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Government bond yields are climbing across major economies. This signals growing pressure on an asset class long viewed as a safe haven. The Global Financial System may soon be approaching a MAJOR turning point. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/59M4rpeqxj

    88115327K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.492% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 721 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Bravos Research's engagement rate on X?
Bravos Research (@bravosresearch) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,030 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Bravos Research sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bravosresearch have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @bravosresearch post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going