Back to @bordeauxyt's profile

Bordeaux engagement report

@bordeauxyt - 133K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.28%
of 133K followers
Per impression
1.38%
123K views on a typical post
Reach
92.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
43 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 1.28%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 92.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #udpartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bordeaux's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.28%, Bordeaux sits above the 75th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.674% to 2.54%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,096 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 7, 202627x their median

    IDGAF about a partnership. Make a stand against micro transactions in Dynasty and RTG. Take them out and bring XP sliders back @EASPORTSCollege #CFBPlayDontPay

    39K5.4K5993962.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202610x their median

    somebody on the dev team cooked this weekend LOL https://t.co/wMRyMcjm4x

    18K18044111.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.5x their median

    there is a world where UMass could actually go from 0-12 to 12-0 in one season https://t.co/aSDNJzBGY5

    9.1K13213421542K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.8x their median

    I accidentally fell asleep, woke up livid I missed most of the SMU/Florida State game Instead I flip it on to see the game still hasn’t started and hear the FSU War Chant immediately. Inject this into my veins. This is college football.

    8.1K65280109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.2x their median

    DISBAND THE NC STATE FOOTBALL PROGRAM IMMEDIATELY HOW DO YOU LOSE HERE 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/XqOFWelxae

    6.7K2246547179K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.8x their median

    You can go 91-0, win 5 National Championships, and still not be the top candidate for loads of jobs in College Football 27 The coaching carousel is a joke in this game. @BryceTinson’s experiment shows that Coach level is almost all that matters Just copy and paste what we had in NCAA Football 14 for College Football 28. It’s been 3 years and it’s been wrong every time

    6.1K19114428451K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.1x their median

    YES THIS IS A REAL FINAL SCORE https://t.co/UiQShLsZjW

    5.1K9431178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.9x their median

    Tommy Castellanos is back in college football Looks like nothing has changed https://t.co/gXG5N7kfiP

    4.8K825040712K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.5x their median

    Even South Carolina players are done with Shane Beamer Toasted program https://t.co/aYRu7pvnq5

    4.1K1267452946K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.2x their median

    5 years ago today, FCS Jacksonville State beats Florida State on last second hail mary and they took home $400,000. Mike Norvell is still the head coach for the Seminoles. https://t.co/fxMItDRWbw

    3.3K2383885422K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#udpartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 1.28%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 92.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is Bordeaux's engagement rate on X?
Bordeaux (@bordeauxyt) has an engagement rate of 1.28%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,777 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.28%, Bordeaux sits above the 75th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bordeauxyt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bordeauxyt post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going