Back to @boopyape's profile

a engagement report

@boopyape - 134K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.396%
of 134K followers
Per impression
7.47%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
5.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
530
interactions (median)
Saved
0.374%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 530 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.396%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 7.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 73x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

a's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.396%, a sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 80 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 202673x their median

    https://t.co/u6QQvKggwd

    36K2.0K15234816M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202652x their median

    Jack Antonoff and Margaret Qualley spark breakup rumors after Antonoff attended Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding alone. Qualley was also rumored to be linked with a recent costar. Neither party has confirmed these rumors. https://t.co/BY8k5d5gAy

    24K4063672.4K20M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202633x their median

    Jennifer Stone reveals David Henrie told her it didn’t make sense for her to appear in ‘Wizards Beyond Waverly Place,’ explaining that the show focused on a different family and that Selena Gomez only makes guest appearances. https://t.co/FdmnkwjiKx

    16K7211454022.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202628x their median

    Zosia Mamet joins the cast of ‘INDUSTRY’ Season 5. https://t.co/tUxEDceYUO

    13K6811321.0K1.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202628x their median

    ‘FORGOTTEN ISLAND’ earned $12.8M on its domestic opening weekend. • Budget was $80M • One of the worst openings ever for DreamWorks https://t.co/BHvuhoxeT6

    12K6209221.3K9.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202625x their median

    #TheOdyssey translator Emily Wilson slams Christopher Nolan's movie over "abysmal" writing: “I would be ashamed to have written any part of this script.” “Nolan’s ‘Odyssey’ lacks many of the elements that make the poem great. It has nothing convincing to say about time, memory, history, war, or bout the relationship between one warrior’s glorious return and the lives of his family, adversaries, comrades, friends and neighbors. It lacks psychological, emotional, political and ethical depth. Its narrative structure is gimmicky. The writing is abysmal. None of the characters has convincing motivation for their actions or words. There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible.” (via London Review of Books/The Guardian). https://t.co/EsOFhy5cCX

    9.8K9411.2K1.6K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.5x their median

    Ben Platt has been cast in ‘INDUSTRY’ Season 5. https://t.co/ensm5g4Iap

    2.7K9135601463K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.7x their median

    Americans: are you meant to drink the milkshake *with* the burger, or as an after-burger dessert?

    1.8K8138852.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.8x their median

    I think I’m bi-curious but the other way around https://t.co/ZgbZV0dMKk

    1.4K3410522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    Becoming him https://t.co/hV2tWWOjRB

    90220708.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 530 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.396%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 7.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 73x its own typical post.

What is a's engagement rate on X?
a (@boopyape) has an engagement rate of 0.396%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 133,540 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.396%, a sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @boopyape have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @boopyape post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going