bomani engagement report
@bomani_jones - 533K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 533K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.241% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #boomer, #cantwait.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #boomer, #cantwait.
Compared with accounts its own size
bomani's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, bomani sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 19% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 56% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 7, 202652x their median
20 years ago today I went to my first game at the Cotton Bowl I used to hate this photo. Now I’m grateful to be a part of the lore of the best rivalry in all of sports. Fuck texas, man. You don’t hate them enough. #Boomer https://t.co/9mFYDtUrr0
- Sep 11, 202632x their median
they still teach kids about john brown?
- Sep 1, 202624x their median
Scottie Pippen on Charles Barkley after demanding a trade from the Houston Rockets in 1999: “I probably should've listened to Michael a year ago when he said that Charles will never win a championship because he doesn't show any dedication. He's a very selfish guy. He doesn't show the desire to want to win. That's my reason for wanting to get away from playing with him — because he just doesn't show the dedication.” “I wouldn't give Charles Barkley an apology at gunpoint. He can never expect an apology from me. If anything, he owes me an apology for coming to play with his sorry fat butt.”
- Oct 23, 202316x their median
#TheRightTime is back! watch live on youtube at noon et monday, wednesday and friday. for the podcast, if you were subscribed before, you're still subscribed. if you're new, here are all the links: https://t.co/Ai1azjKaNV
- Oct 8, 202616x their median
Lions DC Kelvin Sheppard asked how realistic it is for Brian Branch to play this weekend: "If we were playing tonight, it'd be realistic."
- Sep 1, 202615x their median
Amazing article by @hbryant42 on what has made itself obvious in America in the 10 years since Colin Kaepernick took a knee. https://t.co/S6UZavIUy3 https://t.co/N6ILcSjvhs
- Sep 13, 202614x their median
hearing “the old veteran jadeveon clowney” hit me real funny.
- Aug 9, 202614x their median
it’s a little early, yes, but i put on “enter the dragon” on prime video. said it had 7.8 stars. seven point eight. people are allowed to have bad taste, i know. i know. but i must not understand how numbers work cuz where’d the other 2.2 go? who are those people?
- Oct 8, 202613x their median
46 years ago, Prince's "Dirty Mind" was released. His third album, mostly cut alone at home and released almost as the demos. Raw funk, rock and new wave, sexually explicit. https://t.co/5moWrtReDG
- Aug 15, 202611x their median
Horry-Ainge towel incident (1997) Suns & Lakers trade https://t.co/IhkKayAeij
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 533K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.241% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #boomer, #cantwait.
- What is bomani's engagement rate on X?
- bomani (@bomani_jones) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 532,517 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, bomani sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bomani_jones have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @bomani_jones post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.