Back to @bobinfanti's profile

Robert Infanti engagement report

@bobinfanti - 217K followers on X

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 217K followers
Per impression
0.754%
663 views on a typical post
Reach
0.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 663 times each, and 0.754% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.305% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 6832x its own typical post.

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert Infanti's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Robert Infanti sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,467 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video2% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 2% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 194 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 20266832x their median

    Basit denklemi herkes yanlış çözüyor. y nedir? https://t.co/SmeRcFNIWM

    10K61822K1.2K11M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20268.2x their median

    TRIBULATION CHAPTER 6: VERSES 9 TO 11. OUR CREATOR GOD IS COUNTING AND THE DEADLINE IS HIS PROMISE THE SOULS . THEY ARE NOT MARTERS, THEY DO NOT HAVE HAVE CROWNS ANDARE NOT IN HEAVEN. THEY ARE CHILDERS MURDERED BEFORE ACHIEVING THE AGE OF REASONING. https://t.co/4dMkT2JTnE

    276711.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.2x their median

    El dinero —ya sea en forma de billetes, oro, monedas de naturaleza ambigua o en formato digital— carece de valor en el más allá. El amor, en cualquiera de sus formas, posee un valor verdadero y estable, tanto aquí como en el más allá.

    203301.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.0x their median

    MONEY, IN THE FORM OF BANKNOTES, GOLD, AMBIGUOUS COINS, OR IN DIGITAL FORM HAS NO VALUE IN THE AFTER LIFE. LOVE IN ANY FORM , HERE, OR HERE AFTER HAS TRUE STABLE VALUE.

    211301.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.6x their median

    로마서 10장 3-4절: 3 그들은 하나님의 의를 알지 못하고 자기들의 의를 세우려고 힘써 하나님의 의에 복종하지 아니하였느니라. 4 그리스도는 믿는 자에게 의를 이루기 위하여 율법의 마침이 되시니라.

    18410748 viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.6x their median

    2 CORINTHIANS 1 : - 3 - 4 - 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, 4 who comforts us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort those who are in any trouble, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God

    15440722 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.0x their median

    ローマ人への手紙 10章3節・4節:3 彼らは神の義を知らず、自分自身の義を立てようと努めて、神の義に従いませんでした。4 キリストは、信じる者すべてに義をもたらすために、律法の終わりとなられたのです。

    16310921 viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.0x their median

    データといった形のお金には、死後の世界で何の価値もありません。一方、現世であれ来世であれ、どのような形であれ「愛」こそが、真に不変の価値を持つのです。

    143301.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.8x their median

    ومیانو ۱۰: ۳ - ۴ — ۳ ځکه چې هغوی د خدای له عدالت څخه ناخبره وو او د خپل عدالت د ټینګولو په لټه کې وو، نو د خدای عدالت ته یې غاړه کېنښوده. ۴ ځکه چې مسیح د شریعت پای دی، ترڅو د هر هغه چا لپاره چې ایمان راوړي، عدالت رامنځته کړي.

    15310863 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.4x their median

    LU-CA 6:18-19 – ...cũng như những người bị các uế linh hành hạ. Và họ đều được chữa lành. 19 Cả đám đông đều tìm cách chạm vào Ngài, vì có quyền năng từ Ngài tỏa ra và chữa lành cho tất cả họ.

    12140675 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 663 times each, and 0.754% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.305% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 6832x its own typical post.

What is Robert Infanti's engagement rate on X?
Robert Infanti (@bobinfanti) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 91 original posts from the last 30 days against 217,216 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Robert Infanti sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bobinfanti have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bobinfanti post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going