Back to @blessedswifty's profile

Taylor Swift News engagement report

@blessedswifty - 178K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.08%
of 178K followers
Per impression
11.3%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
27.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.345%
168 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.5K interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 3.08%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 11.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #patientzeromusicvideo, #vmas.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #patientzeromusicvideo, #vmas.

Compared with accounts its own size

Taylor Swift News's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.08%, Taylor Swift News sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 196 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 20123.2x their median

    #AUGUST13 http://t.co/t5zWv10a

    13K3.0K657632View on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.1x their median

    HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF 😭 https://t.co/58TQhVQvvU

    10K1.5K63066K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.7x their median

    “Charli XCX disse algo que eu achei ótimo a um tempo atrás. Ela disse o quão estressante é a rotina de shows, e como é impossível se recuperar nessas poucas horas que você tem após o show, o que não é muito. É um nível de estresse que não sei até onde é sustentável. Ela disse que ela não é assim, e eu também não sou assim. Eu era quando era mais jovem, mas agora eu me questiono se realmente era preparada pra isso, porque isso levou a muitas coisas na época que me fizeram não ter o pé no chão. Não é apenas sobre os shows e as multidões. Até os ensaios, que é uma etapa que estou agora. É apenas uma noite para a audiência, pra você são meses de preparação. Tudo na sua vida precisa se ajustar para que você vá em turnê.” — Miley para Zane Lowe.

    6.4K1523832.4K8.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    🚨 | According to Amazon Music, @TaylorSwift13's “Patient Zero” has a runtime of 3 minutes 46 seconds. — The song is produced by Max Martin and Shellback. https://t.co/mcLRgKb84b

    7.2K43819128209K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Reason of panic: https://t.co/EzwZ70tLof

    6.4K4571333K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    ‼️ | @Tinashe liked a shady post towards @TaylorSwift13 on Instagram: “pov: you don’t care that Taylor Swift dropped bc Tinashe dropped an album” https://t.co/SozRUmvsZq

    4.8K267205248410K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    🚨 POP EMERGENCY 🚨 Taylor Swift with her new haircut! https://t.co/I5e7zOSr9D

    5.1K30444966K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    ‼️ | @TaylorSwift13 for ‘The Life of a Showgirl: The Encore’ https://t.co/6rRsFr3Nem

    3.8K33151744K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    ‼️ | Olivia Rodrigo liked a Pitchfork post to shade Taylor Swift https://t.co/Bpmg9JCx8K

    3.9K834453316K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.2x their median

    A master class in shade 💋 https://t.co/vWJ2Yaeewc

    3.6K29712544K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#patientzeromusicvideo#vmas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.5K interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 3.08%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 11.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #patientzeromusicvideo, #vmas.

What is Taylor Swift News's engagement rate on X?
Taylor Swift News (@blessedswifty) has an engagement rate of 3.08%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 178,366 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.08%, Taylor Swift News sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @blessedswifty have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @blessedswifty post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going