Julie Bindel engagement report
@bindelj - 143K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Julie Bindel's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.094%, Julie Bindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.706% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 23% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 69% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 259 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 21, 20266.5x their median
With the news out of Finland re the harms of puberty blockers, and the survey which has established that the majority of the Dutch disagree with the Dutch Protocol, here is a reminder of how utterly batshit Iceland is re gender ideology (gift token): https://t.co/ZYNx9Z1JyD
- Sep 24, 20264.1x their median
1/3 The thing about the lesbian bar story is, aside from Covid and the internet, this all happened before! When I first met the wombyn type lesbians (of which I was not one), at the end of the 1970s, they were pulling stunts like that then!!! They all had M.E., which I called
- Sep 21, 20263.8x their median
"Officers showed up at the property but MacGregor told them the call was a mistake and she was safe in Brennan's company." AND Police had been called before - the murderer had previous convictions Poor Brodie. How she must have suffered. I hope he rots. https://t.co/ZjAc8woB0R
- Sep 25, 20263.2x their median
This is spot on: https://t.co/ZLvcUBHAwo
- Sep 23, 20262.6x their median
I was invited to speak at a fringe meeting at the Labour party conference on the usual, and disinvited when I explained how angry and disgusted I was with the rank and file. I think I would have added something, but cults are going to cult I suppose...🙄
- Sep 24, 20262.4x their median
Re crazed lesbians - this is me and the long-suffering one, celebrating at the end of the 1980s when lesbian identity politics was declared colonised by the Differently Abled Community: https://t.co/1htxBCxrcS
- Sep 22, 2026
https://t.co/rdSrejQtTA LOL from the brilliant @BoozeAndFagz (as ever). She is right, of course, although I will always fancy Camilla over Diana: "I’ve had a few feuds in my time – like any fascinating woman – but one of the funniest was when I fell out with my comrade, Julie Bindel. We were both women of working-class origin propelled to the giddy heights of media notoriety, and I had always felt that we vied to see who could remain truest to our proletarian roots. Then, with one stroke, conclusively, I had won – because I backed Diana after the ‘Three of us in this marriage’ interview with Martin Bashir, while Bindel backed Camilla. We laugh about it now, but at the time, at my instigation, we didn’t talk for five years."
- Sep 26, 2026
Andrea Dworkin would have celebrated her 80th birthday today. I really miss her: https://t.co/P8ub0TwKlF
- Sep 24, 2026
In this month's @TheCriticMag I have an interview with @Katy_Faust (who campaigns to repeal equal marriage). Ignore her at your peril! https://t.co/PCQHq8cKnF
- Sep 22, 2026
🚨FAA IN-PERSON EVENT - GET YOUR TICKETS HERE📢 LONDON, THURSDAY 22ND OCTOBER We are delighted to host Rethinking Feminism After 7 October with @karajesella @NimkoAli and @bindelj in collaboration with @centre_as as we launch Kara Jesella’s new book Feminist Antisemitism: An Intellectual History. As questions of race, privilege and power have moved to the centre of feminist politics, Jewish women have been recast as symbols of whiteness; and privilege, despite a long history of exclusion, discrimination and persecution. Why is antisemitism within feminism often treated differently from other forms of prejudice? What does that mean for the future of feminism? And is there a place for Jewish women in feminism anymore? GET YOUR TICKETS HERE https://t.co/WL62KDSzDN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.
- What is Julie Bindel's engagement rate on X?
- Julie Bindel (@bindelj) has an engagement rate of 0.094%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,323 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.094%, Julie Bindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bindelj have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @bindelj post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.