Back to @bida's profile

Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura engagement report

@bida - 160K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.01%
of 160K followers
Per impression
0.307%
5.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2026164x their median

    Another one for @donk1337 😏 Spirit's superstar wins his third HLTV and @1xBet_Esports MVP award of 2026 at BLAST Open Porto https://t.co/W0426DyXWx

    2.3K11911931278K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026138x their median

    Bora LOUD! Parabens pelo bi campeonato! Booooa @loud_lukxo

    2.2K3613015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026112x their median

    Que esse post alcance o MÁXIMO de mulheres possível. Criamos o +segura, uma plataforma interativa que orienta mulheres sobre como e onde denunciar corretamente crimes virtuais (não só nos games). ⚠️É GRATUITA E NÃO RECOLHE INFO PESSOAIS Saiba mais: https://t.co/pwX8qNedNt

    1.1K564523271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202689x their median

    In CS2, the shadow render distance is affected by the resolution. Here's 4:3 vs 16:9 comparison at the highest video settings. This was discovered by u/crisjame while he was watching a match of Falcons vs. LVG. https://t.co/gdFmvg8sRh

    1.3K336618635K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202679x their median

    Esse assunto de Molodoy e Yekindar não continuar na FURIA ao final do ano não me surpreenderia em nada. Com o FalleN se aposentando e o Yekindar não querendo ser IGL, a Furia precisaria de um brasileiro dando call em inglês ou teria uma lineup com mais gringos do que BR. Além disso, é um bom momento para resetar um pouco a expectativa do time em objetivos internacionais. O time atual é montado para batalhar pelo título, o próximo pode ser menos ambicioso. Novo projeto ao redor do KSC e yuurih?

    1.2K440299K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202654x their median

    Que moleque quebrado https://t.co/f1Xk1rpxNt

    842518355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202650x their median

    VAZOU! @FalleNCS tá puro? kkkkk https://t.co/vERHEN4VxC

    7701715233K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202647x their median

    🆕 @piriajrcs deixa time titular da @paiNGamingBR https://t.co/HBXpU0THHI

    596410545156K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202645x their median

    😬 https://t.co/Q8XYvyaApj

    62322036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202632x their median

    A story about what esports is really like. The dirty actions of players and their agents behind the organization’s back — all in the new video. Enjoy! https://t.co/rHll7g8EF1 https://t.co/mNh0HRGSYc

    204725551510K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.

What is Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura's engagement rate on X?
Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura (@bida) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 159,891 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bida have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bida post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going