Brad Feld engagement report
@bfeld - 389K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.102% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 416 interactions, about 59x its own typical post.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brad Feld's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, Brad Feld sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 4% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 260 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202659x their median
Amy texted me this list yesterday. I'm 60, closing in on 61, and thinking more about what I actually care about. The real luxuries in life: time, health, a quiet mind, slow mornings, rest without guilt, calm and "boring" days, people who love you back. https://t.co/UlpttjMRSr
- Aug 5, 20266.0x their median
I felt lazy today so rather than doing simple math I asked Google how long it has been since WW2 ended. It told me it had been 10 years. I mean ... ok. Fortunately, I can still do math in my head (AI hasn't made me totally dumb yet) so I know it's 80 years, and Google's response when I told it was "You are completely right, and I apologize for that massive math mistake. It has actually been 80 years (turning 81 this coming September) since World War II officially ended on September 2, 1945." I'm so glad that AI is working so incredibly well.
- Sep 4, 20265.3x their median
Every piece of my home automation already worked. The only broken thing was that none of them talk to each other. So I built the dashboard myself. https://t.co/kWA7hmwJMe https://t.co/iVFuwtNOdR
- Aug 30, 20265.1x their median
Chapter 43: Out Loud Marcus is offered eight hours on a quantum computer. He pays by promising never to sell what his team built. Vlad asks what he gave away. "Five hundred billion dollars." "No way it's five hundred billion dollars." https://t.co/bvzZaZBnFe
- Jul 26, 20264.9x their median
I finished book 8 of Dungeon Crawler Carl on my run today. Eight months, eight books, savored every one. Dinniman's world building isn't decoration - the rules of each dungeon level are the plot. https://t.co/bIWtaF6FzG
- Aug 30, 20263.7x their median
I spent four days building the machinery around my novel instead of writing it. A dashboard that turns reader notes into published edits, two websites that exist inside the story, and a narration test that worked. https://t.co/AjDMSlubuV
- Aug 17, 20263.6x their median
I'd been playing Claude slot-machine - feeding it and moving it along instead of thinking about each problem I was trying to solve. So I took a week off, read a book, built a Lego T-Rex, and took my blog back from the AI. https://t.co/u13a2VM5Vy
- Aug 9, 20262.7x their median
In 1492 an abbot wrote a defense of copying manuscripts by hand. He had it printed. https://t.co/wDC2fc29fm
- Sep 29, 20262.3x their median
Puck turns your own React components into a drag-and-drop page builder. It's the breakthrough behind AuthorMagic's book-site builder, and I liked it enough to invest in the company. https://t.co/2qCZHFEmfL
- Aug 20, 20262.1x their median
For a decade now, the Startup Benchmarks Report (which you might remember as the OpenView SaaS report) has been a critical tool for founders trying to understand if they are on track. High Alpha took over the project a few years ago to make sure this data didn't disappear. They are currently surveying for the 10th-anniversary edition. I always encourage founders to look at this data, but the data is only useful if we all contribute to it. Spend 10 minutes filling out the survey. It's a small give that creates a massive get for the startup community. https://t.co/x120Lr4zPn
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.102% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 416 interactions, about 59x its own typical post.
- What is Brad Feld's engagement rate on X?
- Brad Feld (@bfeld) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,646 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, Brad Feld sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bfeld have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @bfeld post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.